About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, May 7, 2005 - 7:25amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I am looking forward to this Robert.  My only quibble so far is the statement:

If one recognises that "existence exists," this means that something cannot come from nothing,

 

seems to belie:

 

no beginning nor any end,

 

 




Post 1

Saturday, May 7, 2005 - 9:31amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
This is in reference to the universe at large - that it exists and thus has always existed, belieing the ex nihilo view.



Post 2

Saturday, May 7, 2005 - 10:06amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Very interesting...



Post 3

Saturday, May 7, 2005 - 10:18amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I, too, will do my best, with my limited science background, to follow you into your next piece. This is very interesting. I have always been fascinated by the theory of evolution, and have read several pop science books about it over the last 40 years.



Post 4

Wednesday, June 1, 2005 - 6:25amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
In light of how much mis-information is being given, on other threads, regarding the flaws of the 'big bang', and alternative world-views, such as 'plasma cosmology', perhaps the following links might prove of interest to some........
                      
                          http://www.cosmologystatement.org/
                          http://www.bigbangneverhappened.org/

If nothing else, these sites provide much grist for thinking on established notions, especially as they pertain to the view of an integrated universe......




Post 5

Thursday, May 11, 2006 - 5:15amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Gee - has it been a year already since this was first posted? Wonder if it will get as little on it this time around as last.....



Post 6

Thursday, May 11, 2006 - 6:54pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Thanks, Robert for the brief question. I took it as an invitation to do a little poking around. This is interesting stuff, even if partly or mostly mushy where it ventures into the outer limits of cosmic wonderment.

It's good that Hannes Alfven published his work in plasma cosmology. . . even if the theoretical work beyond his stellar achievements in plasma physics does not ultimately take hold as the final explication of the whole dang scary thing. Even if ultimately wrong, then, in its synthetic pretensions, it is normal science to have this explication battle the inflation model of dark undetected this and dark undetected that.

Although the model seems a little creaky and denuded in the picture immediately below (especially with the spooky "knowledge" flow . . . ), the next pictures tell me that this is exciting, beautiful matter at work, and perceivable fact -- flame, lightning, plasma screens, auroras and the awesome Magnetosphere.







As to the lack of a response after a year, I would suggest you get in there and revise and expand - add a few links. The beauty of this stuff is the actual big fat thick wad of work that has been published. If you link to some of that, you give folks more to explore and chew on, I figure.

WS



Post 7

Thursday, May 11, 2006 - 11:14pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
No Big Bang : Contents



Post 8

Thursday, December 27, 2007 - 7:37amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
In view of part three being brought up, including this as well...... and agree a revision is in order to provide more detail in the mega aspects....



Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.