About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 6:56amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Wow, Jason, this article is incredible. Incredibly insightful, and I think its very important that it is read. I read the news of people threatening that they would create cartoons that denied the holocaust, but I didn't connect it together like you had. Thank you.



Post 1

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 7:16amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Great job. This is one of the best articles I've seen... anywhere in some time.

- Jason




Post 2

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 8:09pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Spot on, Jason P. (and Jason Q.)!

Ed




Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 8:27pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Fantastic Jason!  You really tied in several important concepts together in a coherent and clear way.  Great job!

I liked this quote of yours: "But if freedom of speech is only to express subjective unverifiable sentiment, why is it so important? If ideas can’t make a difference in reality why not limit speech to spare others’ hurt feelings?"

You're right that the concept of truth is usually thrown out when people start having their feelings hurt.  Tolerance now revolves around not upsetting anyone, no matter if their beliefs contradict reality.

Recently someone here linked to an archive of cartoons dealing with this subject.  Many of them were on target.  I remember one that bothered me.




It seems to offer a moral equivocation.  The West depicted Mohammad.  The Muslims ran around looking to kidnap, threatening lives, rampaging, burning embassies, and offering rewards for murder.  And here they are, as if the two positions are just personal points of view.  It's all about subjective feelings.  How are we to judge?  Can't we all just get along?

Thanks again for the article, Jason.  It's an important reminder.




Post 4

Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - 6:03pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

Thanks, guys. I’m glad you saw the need for this article in the midst of all that’s been written. I think our unique approach of fighting for liberty is far more powerful than those of the pure-libertarian or left-liberals (when the latter still cares about liberty.) While much of cartoon commentary is laudable as far as it goes, it goes only a small fraction of the way. It took me awhile to realize what more was needed as I also found myself distracted by the purely legal/political aspect of free speech.

 

After writing several blog entries I slowly realized that no one is debating the content or fighting for the veracity of the message. I remembered how Rand used to go beyond politics to the fundamental ethical issue and centrality of human life; but she didn’t stop there, she’d go right to weighty epistemological matters. All of which were tightly integrated and mutually reinforcing to make a compelling case, in which politics was but one part.

 

I’ve gotten a good response of earlier drafts from Objectivists, libertarians, conservatives, and undisclosed others.




Post 5

Wednesday, November 28, 2007 - 2:22amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Thank you, Jason, for a nicely crafted statement of principles. 

But if freedom of speech is only to express subjective unverifiable sentiment, why is it so important? If ideas can’t make a difference in reality why not limit speech ...


That rhetorical question opens an investigation that cuts to the core of social life.

You got my sanction vote.




Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.