About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Monday, February 12, 2007 - 9:19amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Tibor:

Thank you for this reminder of the importance to never accept the idea that another person can be the means to my end without their consent.

T



Post 1

Monday, February 12, 2007 - 8:53pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
==================
... the public (human) good cannot involve the violation of basic rights. Those rights in fact serve to define what is the public good, namely, a society in which those basic rights are protected and promoted.
==================

Exactly. When the Founding Fathers said that one purpose of government is to promote the General Welfare, THIS is what it is that they meant (where basic rights are promoted).

Too often otherwise-intelligent folks misinterpret the idea, General Welfare, and take it to mean something other than -- indeed, something opposed to -- Justice. This is a common mistake among political philosophers of our era; John Rawls being a notable example.

Ed




Post 2

Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 5:33amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Why don't you write an article, Ed - The Real Meaning of GENERAL WELFARE.....



Post 3

Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 6:27amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Sounds good, Rev', but don't hold your breath. I'm currently (though only temporarily) working 60 hours a week, which has been draining me.

Ed



Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 4

Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 1:18pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

From “Business Ethics in a Free Society,” in Parth J. Shah, Morality of Markets (New Delhi: Academic Foundation & Centre for Civil Society, 2004): "To begin with, some hold that government regulation is justified in the American legal system, at least, on grounds that it is one of government’s official tasks to ‘promote the general welfare.’  Those who see government regulation as inconsistent with the ideals laid out in the US Declaration of Independence, namely, that government is instituted to secure our unalienable rights, would note that this is a mistaken understanding of the “general welfare” clause.  That means no more than that government exists for the welfare of the people, something that is achieved best by securing the rights of every citizen.  Even if the clause were to amount to a more pro-active view of government, government regulation of business tends to impede rather than enhance the general welfare, given its enormous cost and inefficiency...."

(Edited by Machan on 2/13, 2:41pm)




Post 5

Saturday, November 3, 2007 - 11:48amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Words of wisdom.



Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.