About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2


Post 40

Monday, November 6, 2006 - 4:31pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Bill,

Had I thought that you yourself needed the criticism, I would have addressed you, not Deanna. Given that no-one here is endorsing Logan's Run, I just thought the tone was getting a bit strange. So as to be clear, I have no wish to die, and have no expectation of living forever. As I said, we are only alive TODAY in any case, and it is how we live TODAY that matters. Our TODAY is a summation over time, so it does depend upon both our past actions and our future orientedness. I am not advocating range of the moment living. But I think that by assuming that immortality is just around the corner, (as per Kurzweil, who takes 250 supplements a day) some people may lack the urgency they would otherwise feel under a deadline. Each man's life is his own, and I feel no obligation to pass judgement on how others live, unless, as Deanna said, it affects me directly. But having lost a sister at 26 and the love of my life at 28 (my ages) I know that most people under 50 have no conception of mortality and its capricious nature.

Ted Keer



Post 41

Monday, November 6, 2006 - 4:36pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Michael D.,

I am going to start a thread on Heinlein, there is a lot to say. I will not respond to what you said here. But the correct spelling of the name of the hero of Time enough for love is Lazarus Long. And I do have some inside knowledge on Heinlein & sex.

Ted



Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.