About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Monday, June 18, 2007 - 9:53pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

I received this e-mail invitation blast from the Space Coast Freethought Association (SCFA):

SCFA’s First Amendment Celebration is on for Sunday, July 1, 2007 at 1:30 in the large meeting room of the Melbourne Public Library at 540 E. Fee Ave.

 

Groups are welcome to set up info tables and hand out literature.

 

If you’d like to read a certain part of the U.S. Constitution, email me and let me know and I’ll reserve it for you; otherwise, you can sign up to read portions when you arrive at the meeting. Instead of speeches and music, this year, we’ll read the Constitution and then have something of a First Amendment party with discussion and FOOD!

 

Hope to see you all there!

Given my past experience, I have to wonder about the merits of this event.  Several of its more vocal members tend to interpret the Constitution as a living document aimed at promoting the general welfare rather than a rigid embodiment of natural law aimed at protecting the individual from the collective.  I suppose I could make an appearance and read the Second Amendment with the right tone to show that I support the individual right to weapons ownership, thus entertaining myself with the looks of disgust on the faces of several members, but I do not find the prospect that entertaining.

 

I open the floor to comments and suggestions about whether this event has any redeeming qualities making my appearance as the RoR Local Clubs Coordinator for PROPEL(TM) worthwhile.

(Edited by Luke Setzer on 6/18, 9:55pm)




Post 1

Monday, June 18, 2007 - 10:38pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Luke,

You'd have to decide the merits since you've been there before. I'd consider:

1)What might you better do with your time? during time not spent speaking?
2)Would pissing people off be anything more than just a momentary and meaningless pleasure?
3)Might you actually reach one rational person or sway one real event in a positive way?
4)Is the Second Amendment not well enough understood that perhaps the Ninth or Tenth might be better?
5)Will you truly be in a position to comment and speak clearly on your own views, or will you have to stick to a script and thus run the risk of being misinterpreted?
6)Finally, what other joy will you get from being there if you find you cannot accomplish any of the above goals?

I would look most strongly at questions 3 & 6, assuming there is no better answer to #1.

Ted



Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.