| | Jennifer told the killer that she forgives him for killing her father out of sheer hate.
But you didn't mention if she also wants him to be immediately released from jail. I mean, that's the "justice" part, right?...(The fact that the guy is is serving time for his crime.) If she thinks he shouldn't be punished at all, then you're right...she has a warped view of justice.
But the simple fact that she forgave him has nothing to do with actual justice. As long as she agrees the guy belongs in jail, justice is being served, and she is in support of it.
Also, regarding forgiveness:
Oprah (and other shows) frequently have guests on who forgive the perpetrators of crimes against them; this is often the point of the show, as this forgiveness is seen as inspiring to other people. Basically, these people claim that if they don't forgive, they'll obsess about the crime, and the criminal, and their anger and hatred will take over their lives in a negative way. They say that the forgiveness is for themselves, and their own piece of mind...not to absolve the criminal.
Regarding the gender issue:
Sometimes victims actually do express pity for the criminal, and not only forgive them, but go out of their way to help them. There is a story of another Oprah guest, a man, whose wife and daughter were killed by a teen drag racer. The man, Bruce Murakami, not only forgave the kid, he even assisted in getting him a lighter sentence than he would have received. If this is just a woman thing, how do we explain the fact that, far beyond mere forgiveness, this man actively involved himself in the justice system in order to aid his family's killer?
Apparently both sexes can choose to forgive, or not, and both can have different views of justice. Not that the two necessarily have one to do with the other.
(Apologies if some of this is rehashing part of Ted's point, but I started writing my post before his appeared and I didn't feel like writing a whole new one.)
|
|
