| | I got this rogue's list of agreement by a Toohey clone for the presidential candidates:
John Edwards 85%
Barack Obama 80%
Dennis Kucinich 72%
Hillary Clinton 70%
Cynthia McKinney 70%
Note that these responses were based on responding to the linked explanations of what a particular vote meant, which got some counterintuitive responses. For example, "strong support" for the immigration question included this statist tidbit, "Social services should be offered to all residents of the United States regardless of immigration status", so I went with "support" instead, since it was the most pro-immigration response that didn't advocate a larger welfare state.
Oh, and to keep from getting confused, I answered all questions from a freedom-oriented POV, then reversed the percentages. So, since John Edwards got a 15% rating for freedom-oriented responses, I gave him an 85% Toohey approval rating.
I've taken other presidential rating quizzes and got similar results, except Cynthia McKinney wound up as the worst candidate and Barack Obama wound up as somewhat less bad than HRC. But, meh, anyone who claims to want copious doses of freedom and votes for any of these five deserves, as Mencken put it, to get what they ask for good and hard.
|
|
