About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, September 10, 2004 - 8:05pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
This cowardice shown in advocating appeasement to the Bali Muslims has the precedent in 1989 when Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death by an Iranian cleric while Rushdie was a British citizen. His crime was ostensibly insulting Muslims by publishing his "Satanic Verses."

The fatwa stated:

The author of The Satanic Verses, a text written, edited, and published against Islam, against the Prophet of Islam, and against the Koran, along with all the editors and publishers aware of its contents, are condemned to capital punishment. I call on all valiant Muslims wherever they may be in the world to execute this sentence without delay, so that no one henceforth will dare insult the sacred beliefs of the Muslims.

http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/rushdie.htm
When Ayatollah Khomeini called on all zealous Muslims to execute the writer and the publishers of the book, Rushdie was forced into hiding. Also an aide to Khomeini offered a million-dollar reward for Rushdie's death. In 1993 Rushdie's Norwegian publisher William Nygaard was wounded in an attack outside his house. In 1997 the reward was doubled, and the next year the highest Iranian state prosecutor Morteza Moqtadale renewed the death sentence. During this period of fatwa violent protest in India, Pakistan, and Egypt caused several deaths. In 1990 Rushdie published an essay In Good Faith to appease his critics and issued an apology in which he reaffirmed his respect for Islam. However, Iranian clerics did not repudiate their death threat.
 The following was published Sunday, October 4, 1998 by the BBC:
In remarks quoted by Iranian radio on Saturday, Mr Kharrazi said: "We did not adopt a new position with regard to the apostate Salman Rushdie, and our position remains the same as that which has been repeatedly stated by the Islamic Republic of Iran's officials.

"In fact, it was the British Government which decided to elevate its political relations with Iran to ambassadorial level.  

"This itself is further evidence of the just position and power of Iran in the international community." Last month Iranian President Mohammad Khatami said the Rushdie affair should be considered completely finished.

 I firmly believe that if the U.K. had stood up for the rights of this citizen with the strongest of sanctions, including military action, the Muslim world would not be the same today.

Sam




Post 1

Saturday, September 11, 2004 - 8:45amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Cass, Sam,

Excellent article and excellent response, Sam.

The Rushdie affair was for me, the beginning of my study of Islam in earnest, which has led to my conclusion that it is an irredeemable anti-human anti-civilization ideology.

Two questions:

Have either of you read Rushdie?

Did you write this article, Cass? (I thought you were a kangaroo.)

Regi




Post 2

Saturday, September 11, 2004 - 9:57amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Yes, Regi. I have read Rushdie's "Midnight's Children." He is a most original and imaginative writer and has been compared to Gabriel Garcia Marquez and his "One Hundred Years of Solitude." As a member of a book discussion group I have read both, but a personal inability to remember a lot of details of things I have read in the past (Rand's works excepted) prevents me from commenting except that neither writer exhibits an Objectivist bent.

Sam



Post 3

Saturday, September 11, 2004 - 2:48pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

I agree with Regi: Excellent article, Cass, and excellent response, Sam. But the facts you name are terrible, Cass. I suspect my own reaction is fairly typical. I'll hear of some cowardly bending to terrorism, I'm shocked by it, and I think nothing could be worse than this and I'll never be shocked again. Then I hear of another cowardly bending -- and I'm shocked all over again. I suppose it's as well that we don't get used to such craven appeasement.

Barbara




Post 4

Saturday, September 11, 2004 - 5:27pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Hi Sam,

I have read Rushdie, but was curious to know what other's thought of him. Personally, I think he is an outstanding writer, with an amazing imagination, the ability to create extremely complex plots which one has no trouble following, and creating a constant sense of suspense, which is a very rare talent.

I admire his ability, and actually enjoy reading him, but do not "like" his works. I would never reread anything he wrote. I frequently reread Hugo, Dostoevsky, Maugham, Twain, and of course Rand, for example.

[I'd love to know where SOLO's spell checker came from. It just told me Hugo, Dostoevsky,  and Maugham are mispelled, but that wold (for would) is OK. It must be a New Zealand spell checker.]

Regi





Post 5

Tuesday, September 14, 2004 - 1:03amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Barbara, Regi,
Thankyou both for the kind and encouraging words for my first SOLO article. It's when news like this gets to me it's good to have a site like SOLO to go to, and not feel so desperate and lonely. Sorry to get back so late, but I don't do much else when working!!
And Regi, yes indeed, I did write it; however in thinking I was a kangaroo all I can say is, should you recall these creatures magnificent over abundance of energy and grace, bounding glowing gold across the plains, then see my washed out olive and pink staggering out of bed peering blearily around the kitchen for a clean cup and coffee, you'd have to mutter "If only...'tis pity she's a wench"!!!! 
{And how you manage to make me laugh out loud after a 10hour shift I really don't know!!}
Cass  




Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.