RoR: Forum

Post 0

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 9:15am

Link

Edit

"It's deceitful to pretend to defend sound economic principles while undermining the very fabric of society,"

BWAH HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!

Does a heart good.

Post 1

Wednesday, October 19, 2005 - 9:32am

Link

Edit

"It's deceitful to pretend to defend sound economic principles while undermining the very fabric of society," she added.

Yes, those evil gay people!! Gotta stamp 'em all out before they completely destroy Western civilization!

< /sarcasm>

One of the reasons that I broke ranks with hard-line conservatives is their incessant, pathological obsession with sexual orientation and other, so-called social issues. Lighten up, lady...

Post 2

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 4:25pm

Link

Edit

What a silly fool. The fabric of society is strengthened by people learning to mind their own business instead of worrying about who's having sex with whom, and in what position.

Post 3

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 4:32pm

Link

Edit

Good fences make good neighbors.

Post 4

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 4:33pm

Link

Edit

The fabric of society is strengthened by people learning to mind their own business instead of worrying about who's having sex with whom, and in what position.

There's more than one position??

*sigh* I need to get out more...

;o)

Post 5

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 5:38pm

Link

Edit

You people out west of the Mississippi need to get a life - lol... be glad when the gathering meets here in Florida next year, y'all might find newness ... not just weirdness...

[of course if you get stuck with one of Luke's flowcharts, then all bets are off...] :-)

(Edited by robert malcom on 10/20, 5:40pm)

Post 6

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 7:19pm

Link

Edit

Yes, Summer, there are a lot more than one position. I've only figured out ten or so, myself.

Post 7

Thursday, October 20, 2005 - 9:31pm

Link

Edit

Clearly this is all part of some devious Christianist plot. Everyone knows that all Christians and Republicans hate gay people and want to put them in camps.

Post 8

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 4:54am

Link

Edit

I've only figured out ten or so, myself.

Only ten?? It's a good thing I'm celibate, or I'd have to hire a gymnastics instructor just to get me up to speed...

Post 9

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 5:36am

Link

Edit

Only ten. I didn't get started until August of last year.

Post 10

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 6:18am

Link

Edit

What is this - a 'one a month' club?

Post 11

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 9:09am

Link

Edit

Yep. This month's position is reverse cowgirl.

Post 12

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 9:16am

Link

Edit

Ugh... Now I'm really confused...

I don't know if I should be taking notes, or taking the vows.

(Edited by Summer Serravillo on 10/21, 9:17am)

Post 13

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 10:26am

Link

Edit

Everyone knows that all Christians and Republicans hate gay people and want to put them in camps.

Or at least put them in cages and poke at them with sticks.

Or maybe camps it is- gay deprogramming camps. They'll all come out with that scary faraway look in their eye. The look that only comes after lots of current has been applied to your gonads.

rde
Inventor of the Ludovico Variation of gay-reprogramming.
,

<------- Preparing the patient to watch Davey & Goliath marathon.

Post 14

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 11:11am

Link

Edit

When I was in college (during the Precambrian era), Graham Chapman, of Monty Python fame, held a little Q&A session in one of the larger lecture halls. Naturally, some muculent, pimply-faced gastropod asked Chapman to address the rumors that he was gay. Chapman responded with the following story:

Upon hearing the rumors that one of the troupe was homosexual, a British woman wrote the Python troupe to express her concerns. According to Chapman, "Her handwriting became visibly angrier as she went on to say that persons like that should not be allowed to live. Eric (Idle) wrote back to the lady saying that we (the Pythons) had found out which one it was and killed him."

SmS

(Edited by Summer Serravillo on 10/21, 11:30am)

Post 15

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 12:58pm

Link

Edit

Summer, "reverse cowgirl" is just woman-on-top but with the woman facing the man's feet instead of his face.

Post 16

Friday, October 21, 2005 - 2:07pm

Link

Edit

Summer, "reverse cowgirl" is just woman-on-top but with the woman facing the man's feet instead of his face

God Bless You, My Son.

Remember, in this, even as an Objectivist, what you do you do not just for yourself, but for All Men<tm>

rde
Ride 'em Rope 'em Brand 'em, Don't Try to Understand 'em.

(Edited by Rich Engle on 10/21, 2:08pm)

Post 17

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 5:58am

Link

Edit

"...is just woman-on-top but with the woman facing the man's feet instead of his face."

Hmmm... sex while staring at a guy's feet...

Yeah, that does sound like fun.

Post 18

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 6:14am

Link

Edit

Tend to agree, Summer - while that is a common position in porn films, it is mostly for the viewing - being able to see the cock going in and out - but it would seem of lesser value to the pleasuring of the woman since the clit is totally ignored that way, to say nothing that the inside pressuring or rubbing is on the opposite side from the G spot... on the other hand, there are women who love this position, being able to self stimulate, as well as feeling the rubbing against the division between the anal and the uteral, which, they claim, is very stimulating...

Post 19

Saturday, October 22, 2005 - 8:42am

Link

Edit

My flatmate and I have just been giggling over this thread. Graybosch - are you the kid from Weird Science who invented his own woman?