| | Back in the 1980's my chemistry teacher was invited to bring some students to a speech by federal regulators of various scientific industries. After a speech by a nuclear regulator, I stood up for the Q&A period. I said, "Madame X, you stated that you are proud that during your tenure as head of the ABC department, the number of pages of safety regulations has doubled. Is that becuase you unexpectedly found twice as much circuitry or hardware existent in nuclear plants than your predecessors had been aware of, or is it simply due to an inability on your part to be concise?"
Needless to say, there were howls of laughter, followed by chagrined protests at my impertinance. She "refused to dignify my question with a response," and my teacher kicked my shin under the table.
But the question remains. Why do we even need a congress, other than to ratify treaties and to pay the military? Most of what passes for legislation nowadays is grandstanding or piecemeal socialism.
Of course, there actually is one area in which we could use some rationalization of the laws and regulations - software related intellectual property rights. But this is neither glamorous nor easy to understand. I'd love to see Kennedy or McCain try to work on these issues. (Well, actually, I wouldn't, but I'm sure it would be good for some laughs.)
Ted
(Edited by Ted Keer on 2/15, 4:27pm)
|
|