About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5


Post 100

Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 6:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Bill,

Someone told me that resistance training lowered diastolic pressure more than systolic. Do you have any info on that?
Resistance training lowers diastolic about as much as systolic blood pressure. The reason that folks told you that it lowers diastolic more than systolic is because they were mentally contrasting it against aerobic exercise -- which lowers systolic almost twice more than it does diastolic. So what does this mean in plain talk? Well, I'm glad that you asked. :-) Here is what it means:

Resistance training lowers diastolic blood pressure about the same as aerobic exercise does. Resistance training lowers systolic blood pressure, too (about the same as it does diastolic). But if you want the most systolic blood pressure reduction, then do some aerobic training. Aerobic training lowers systolic blood pressure the most. If, for example, you weren't on blood pressure medication and you started with the following blood pressure (mm/Hg):

systolic: 140
diastolic: 80

... then a month of resistance training would give you approximately this blood pressure (mm/Hg):

systolic: 136
diastolic: 76

... or a month of aerobic training would give you approximately this blood pressure (mm/Hg):

systolic: 135
diastolic: 77

Ed

Adapted from:
Collier SR, Kanaley JA, Carhart R Jr, Frechette V, Tobin MM, Hall AK, Luckenbaugh AN, Fernhall B. Effect of 4 weeks of aerobic or resistance exercise training on arterial stiffness, blood flow and blood pressure in pre- and stage-1 hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Oct;22(10):678-86.


Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 101

Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - 3:11pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Young Daniel Hauser is back home, under the care of an oncologist, and prepared to submit to medical treatment -- it appears that his parents and him all now acknowledge that the best approach to beating his cancer involves chemotherapy.

A poignant excerpt from today's USA Today report:

Daniel and Colleen returned to Minnesota on Monday after almost a week on the run. Dr. James Joyce evaluated Daniel at the family's home in Sleepy Eye, and then made an appointment for Daniel to see an oncologist at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota.

That exam showed a tumor in Daniel's chest has grown — and is larger than it was when he was first diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease in January, according to a medical report read in court by Rodenberg. The tumor is pushing against Daniel's trachea, causing pain that Daniel rated as a 10 on a scale of one to 10.


Post 102

Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - 9:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Wow! So religious faith finally succumbed to common sense and empiricism. Hopefully, it's not too late for the chemo to be effective.

Thanks, William, for the update.

Post 103

Wednesday, May 27, 2009 - 5:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Bill,

Your summary is likely too simple. It's the "popular press" version. I know that you are not very intelligent -- i.e., that you have a low IQ -- but I also know you to be very rational. Use your rationality, Bill. Use the force. Ask yourself if conlicts of interest would lead to simplified and adversarial news story headlines (or summaries).

Think of Bush landing and saying the war is already won (for an example of this).

Ed


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5


User ID Password or create a free account.