About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 8:43amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
This quote came to mind while I was working on a programming assignment. :3

-- Brede



Post 1

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 12:01pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Is Elbert the same as E. Ron?




Post 2

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 12:36pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I'm not sure.



Post 3

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 12:48pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Cue The Legend of John Henry's Hammer...



Post 4

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 12:48pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
They appear to be different people, assuming your reference is to L. Ron Hubbard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbert_Hubbard

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L._Ron_Hubbard



Post 5

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 2:35pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Thanks, Mike, I guess I was thinking of the famous Latino hack-science fiction writer/church founder/rum brand el Ron Jabard.

As for the quote, I can appreciate the intent, but then again, it takes a man, no matter how ordinary, to run the machine.

Ted

(Edited by Ted Keer
on 4/21, 2:37pm)




Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 6

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 4:24pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
As #4 points out, they were two different people.  Elbert Hubbard was a leader in the U.S. of the arts and crafts movement, which opposed industrialization and mass production, which is presumably the point he was making here.  A&C was the source of the indispensable phrase "artsy-craftsy."

Merwin and Webster, authors of AR's favorite novel, Calumet K, wrote another novel, Comrade John, in 1907 which was a satire on Hubbard and his colony, Roycroft, near Buffalo.  They portray him as a charlatan.  Herman Stein, the Hubbard lookalike, hires the architect John Chance to design his colony / commune, Beechcroft, and let Stein pass it off as his own work.  He and his crew are also to go undercover, posing as Beechcrofters, so that the colonists, a rather softheaded lot, will think that their own ethos of "beauty through [none too strenuous] toil" put the buildings up.  I have a hunch that this is where Rand got the idea of architectural ghosting that she used in The Fountainhead.




Post 7

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 6:05pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
The truly extraordinary man was the one to invent the machine.



Post 8

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 6:21pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
It's amazing how many eutopian movements existed in the 19th Century. Graham Crackers and Welch's Grape juice, as well as Kellogg's Cereal were originally introduced as means toward healthy living. The temperance movement and many other more successful reform societies existed, including, of course, the abolitionists. There were all sorts of artistic, political and ethical communes set up. Of course, many of these societies would be seen as wrongheaded by Objectivists. But think of today. What are the actual positive analogs of these societies? We have the environmentalists, but the greens and PETA and so forth are mysanthropic, not eutopian. Most of the "idealists" of the early part of the twentieth century ended up as marxists, and we all know how that turned out, even if the left won't admit defeat. (There are bookstores in Manhattan that have larger shelves devoted to Marxism than to the hard sciences.) And now the apologists for isl*m are filling the shelves.

What is it about the spirit of our age that has replaced eutopian zeal with cynicism and leftist or isl*mist resentment?

Ted Keer



Post 9

Saturday, April 21, 2007 - 9:46pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
The truly extraordinary man was the one to invent the machine.

That's the context that I considered the quotation in that no machine can think, but a human can, so that means no matter how many machines you have, you can't replace the first person that thought it up. That person is the one that can make countless machines that can do all the ordinary work in the world. :)

-- Brede



Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 10

Sunday, April 22, 2007 - 12:43amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

 

Elbert Hubbard was born in Bloomington, Illinois in 1856 and died aboard the Lusitania, sunk by a German submarine in April 1915.

 

He has no relation at all with Ron Hubbard, science-fiction author and crazy “inventor” of Scientology.

 

Elbert Hubbard’s probably most famous writing is his “A Message to García” which everybody should read and I enclose herewith. Though I don’t think it necessary to mention, please remember that the Cuba he mentions refers to Cuba’s fight for independence from Spain at the end of the 19th century, not today’s Castro’s dictatorship.

 

Dale Carnegie incorporated the text to his “Public Speaking and Influencing Men in Business”. “A Message to García” originally appeared as an article in the March 1899 issue of the Philistine Magazine. The New York Central Railroad distributed about a million and a half copies of the article. It has been translated into all written languages. During the war between Russia and Japan, every Russian soldier who went to the front was given a copy of the message. The Japanese, finding it and finding it a good thing, translated it into Japanese. The police of the province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, carry it as its motto and I am sure that similar instances can be found elsewhere.

 

More on Elbert Hubbard (so as not to confuse it with Scientology) under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elbert_Hubbard and related Webpages.

 

A Message to Garcia

By Elbert Hubbard

In all this Cuban business there is one man stands out on the horizon of my memory like Mars at perihelion. When war broke out between Spain & the United States, it was very necessary to communicate quickly with the leader of the Insurgents. Garcia was somewhere in the mountain vastness of Cuba- no one knew where. No mail nor telegraph message could reach him. The President must secure his cooperation, and quickly.

What to do!

Some one said to the President, "There’s a fellow by the name of Rowan will find Garcia for you, if anybody can."

Rowan was sent for and given a letter to be delivered to Garcia. How "the fellow by the name of Rowan" took the letter, sealed it up in an oil-skin pouch, strapped it over his heart, in four days landed by night off the coast of Cuba from an open boat, disappeared into the jungle, & in three weeks came out on the other side of the Island, having traversed a hostile country on foot, and delivered his letter to Garcia, are things I have no special desire now to tell in detail.

The point I wish to make is this: McKinley gave Rowan a letter to be delivered to Garcia; Rowan took the letter and did not ask, "Where is he at?" By the Eternal! there is a man whose form should be cast in deathless bronze and the statue placed in every college of the land. It is not book-learning young men need, nor instruction about this and that, but a stiffening of the vertebrae which will cause them to be loyal to a trust, to act promptly, concentrate their energies: do the thing- "Carry a message to Garcia!"

General Garcia is dead now, but there are other Garcias.

No man, who has endeavored to carry out an enterprise where many hands were needed, but has been well nigh appalled at times by the imbecility of the average man- the inability or unwillingness to concentrate on a thing and do it. Slip-shod assistance, foolish inattention, dowdy indifference, & half-hearted work seem the rule; and no man succeeds, unless by hook or crook, or threat, he forces or bribes other men to assist him; or mayhap, God in His goodness performs a miracle, & sends him an Angel of Light for an assistant. You, reader, put this matter to a test: You are sitting now in your office- six clerks are within call.

Summon any one and make this request: "Please look in the encyclopedia and make a brief memorandum for me concerning the life of Correggio".

Will the clerk quietly say, "Yes, sir," and go do the task?

On your life, he will not. He will look at you out of a fishy eye and ask one or more of the following questions:

Who was he?

Which encyclopedia?

Where is the encyclopedia?

Was I hired for that?

Don’t you mean Bismarck?

What’s the matter with Charlie doing it?

Is he dead?

Is there any hurry?

Shan’t I bring you the book and let you look it up yourself?

What do you want to know for?

And I will lay you ten to one that after you have answered the questions, and explained how to find the information, and why you want it, the clerk will go off and get one of the other clerks to help him try to find Garcia- and then come back and tell you there is no such man. Of course I may lose my bet, but according to the Law of Average, I will not.

Now if you are wise you will not bother to explain to your "assistant" that Correggio is indexed under the C’s, not in the K’s, but you will smile sweetly and say, "Never mind," and go look it up yourself.

And this incapacity for independent action, this moral stupidity, this infirmity of the will, this unwillingness to cheerfully catch hold and lift, are the things that put pure Socialism so far into the future. If men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all? A first-mate with knotted club seems necessary; and the dread of getting "the bounce" Saturday night, holds many a worker to his place.

Advertise for a stenographer, and nine out of ten who apply, can neither spell nor punctuate- and do not think it necessary to.

Can such a one write a letter to Garcia?

"You see that bookkeeper," said the foreman to me in a large factory.

"Yes, what about him?"

"Well he’s a fine accountant, but if I’d send him up town on an errand, he might accomplish the errand all right, and on the other hand, might stop at four saloons on the way, and when he got to Main Street, would forget what he had been sent for."

Can such a man be entrusted to carry a message to Garcia?

We have recently been hearing much maudlin sympathy expressed for the "downtrodden denizen of the sweat-shop" and the "homeless wanderer searching for honest employment," & with it all often go many hard words for the men in power.

Nothing is said about the employer who grows old before his time in a vain attempt to get frowsy ne’er-do-wells to do intelligent work; and his long patient striving with "help" that does nothing but loaf when his back is turned. In every store and factory there is a constant weeding-out process going on. The employer is constantly sending away "help" that have shown their incapacity to further the interests of the business, and others are being taken on. No matter how good times are, this sorting continues, only if times are hard and work is scarce, the sorting is done finer- but out and forever out, the incompetent and unworthy go.

It is the survival of the fittest. Self-interest prompts every employer to keep the best- those who can carry a message to Garcia.

I know one man of really brilliant parts who has not the ability to manage a business of his own, and yet who is absolutely worthless to any one else, because he carries with him constantly the insane suspicion that his employer is oppressing, or intending to oppress him. He cannot give orders; and he will not receive them. Should a message be given him to take to Garcia, his answer would probably be, "Take it yourself."

Tonight this man walks the streets looking for work, the wind whistling through his threadbare coat. No one who knows him dare employ him, for he is a regular fire-brand of discontent. He is impervious to reason, and the only thing that can impress him is the toe of a thick-soled No. 9 boot.

Of course I know that one so morally deformed is no less to be pitied than a physical cripple; but in our pitying, let us drop a tear, too, for the men who are striving to carry on a great enterprise, whose working hours are not limited by the whistle, and whose hair is fast turning white through the struggle to hold in line dowdy indifference, slip-shod imbecility, and the heartless ingratitude, which, but for their enterprise, would be both hungry & homeless.

Have I put the matter too strongly? Possibly I have; but when all the world has gone a-slumming I wish to speak a word of sympathy for the man who succeeds- the man who, against great odds has directed the efforts of others, and having succeeded, finds there’s nothing in it: nothing but bare board and clothes.

I have carried a dinner pail & worked for day’s wages, and I have also been an employer of labor, and I know there is something to be said on both sides. There is no excellence, per se, in poverty; rags are no recommendation; & all employers are not rapacious and high-handed, any more than all poor men are virtuous.

My heart goes out to the man who does his work when the "boss" is away, as well as when he is at home. And the man who, when given a letter for Garcia, quietly take the missive, without asking any idiotic questions, and with no lurking intention of chucking it into the nearest sewer, or of doing aught else but deliver it, never gets "laid off," nor has to go on a strike for higher wages. Civilization is one long anxious search for just such individuals. Anything such a man asks shall be granted; his kind is so rare that no employer can afford to let him go. He is wanted in every city, town and village- in every office, shop, store and factory. The world cries out for such: he is needed, & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia.

THE END-



















Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.