About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 10, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Thursday, September 6, 2007 - 11:15amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

The meaning of this saying is clear: “Love is blind.” That is, love or infatuation often makes it difficult for us to be objective about things. It is interesting that this is an old Russian proverb—in the light of the fact that Ayn Rand, who was born in Russia, and rejected so much of that country’s culture, provided in her personal life an illustration of its truth.

 

The second half of the proverb is, of course, the title of a great song also. And in “Smoke Gets in Your Eyes” the lyricist Otto Harbach gave another meaning to this second half:

 

Now, laughing friends deride

Tears I cannot hide.

So I smile and say

“When a lovely flame dies

“Smoke gets in your eyes.”

 

In other words, the end of a love affair brings heartbreak and tears. The speaker has been forced to acknowledge the prescience of those he had chaffed, but he saves face with a sad, sheepish joke.

 

It’s a great lyric, but it could never shine without the great melody by Jerome Kern attached to it. A lyric without a melody is almost always mediocre verse at best. This tune was originally written as a tap dance number, but Harbach suggested that it be slowed down and made into a ballad. It was included in the musical Roberta (1933 Broadway; 1935 movie). Kern must have been especially proud of this creation: whenever the lyricist, in conversation, mentioned its genesis, the composer would cut him off.

 

The song has become a standard, the most well-known recording nowadays being that by The Platters, which reached number one on the charts in 1959. Hard as it is to believe today for those who are familiar with the recording, Jerome Kern’s widow tried to stop distribution of the Platters’ effort, not wanting the song to be done in a “rock and roll” style.

 

Perhaps she had not actually heard the end result. Or perhaps she had heard it once only; often, it takes a second hearing for a piece of music to “get to you.” For, although the Platters recording borrows from the doo-wop and rock ’n roll idioms, it is actually very respectful of the tune. In fact, Platters leader Buck Ram’s arrangement could be described as reverential, bringing a level of drama lacking in some other, more conventional treatments.

 

It is true that extra, melismatic notes are added to the melody, and there is at least one added harmony (which for all I know Jerome Kern may have used himself in some arrangements). But the added notes are not objectionable, being part of the style that The Platters were using. There are two changed notes that to me seem weaker than the original. The words “smoke gets in your eyes” appear twice in the song, and while the first time all the notes are as in the sheet music, the second time there are different notes on the words “in your.” This may have in fact been an error that no one noticed, or that for one reason or another was not corrected. But for most listeners, they do not spoil the song.

 

One only has to hear that harp, those yearning violin notes, that gently swaying feel that pervades the record, to know that the musicians had the deepest regard for the material.

 

Those who are not familiar with the record, or who wish to see a video of The Platters, are invited to click the following link.

 

But, regardless of your reaction, in your journey through life, please remember to keep in mind: When your heart is on firesmoke gets in your eyes.

 

(Edited by Rodney Rawlings on 9/06, 11:54am)




Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Thursday, September 6, 2007 - 9:37pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
sigh...........dreamy  : )



Post 2

Friday, September 7, 2007 - 6:33amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Agreed, Gigi, and thanks for this gem, Rodney.
I was unfamiliar with that song...it was a joy to watch it performed in the video.
Beautiful.




Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 13, No Sanction: 0
Post 3

Friday, September 7, 2007 - 8:24pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
A wonderful melody!!! 

I need to rant.

When I was in school, college music departments routinely overlooked the value of popular music.  When asked, the professors would assert that while popular music may be enjoyable, it will not stand the test of time.  Music composed for the concert hall, they insisted, will stand the test of time, and is therefore worthy of study.  The truth is that most of the concert music written in the 1930's, 40's and 50's has not stood the test of time, while many of the "trifles" produced in the commercial world have!

Unfortunately, post-modernism hasn't only had a negative influence on the fine arts; it has also had an impact on popular music.  Wonderful tunes like Smoke Gets In Your Eyes aren't composed anymore.  There's not much of a market for good tunes anymore. What happened?  I maintain that much of what became popular in music has degraded the listener's ability to discern a good melody from a mediocre one. If listeners grow up inundated with music that depends on volume, blunt rhythms,and shock value, they are rendered insensitive to the nuances and clarity of a finely wrought melody. They can hear something stunningly crafted, and it won't speak to them. 

John Lennon and Paul McCartney wrote some terrific songs (none on the level of Jerome Kern or Richard Rodgers, but damned good songs nonetheless.)    But their success led others of less talent to think that anyone with little or no musical education could create a band and write their own songs.  In my opinion, this led to a decline in songwriting, as bands relied less on compositional ability to create their music than on raucous voices, a rebellious attitude, sex appeal, a relentless beat, and volume.

And then there's the rampant subjectivism and relativism that insists that Mozart is only thought of as great due to cultural bias; that any music is as good as any other music, and that a melody is nothing more than a series of pitches.  So who am I to say that All The Things You Are is a better melody than the spoken semi-rhymed ravings of a hip-hop "artist."  Who's to make any judgements?  After all, it's all a matter of taste.

It isn't.  It really isn't.  There are standards to use in evaluating a piece of music.  But by this time in my rant, when someone tires of hearing me, they just turn up their music louder and drown out the very idea of standards.

End of rant.

Thanks for posting a great song.  Like all the music I love, it makes me glad to be alive!




Post 4

Friday, September 7, 2007 - 9:40pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
"When your heart is on fire, smoke gets in your eyes"

---Yes, but only if the wood is wet.



Post 5

Saturday, September 8, 2007 - 5:47amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Most people's "wood is wet" at one time or another, especially when they are young.

(Edited by Rodney Rawlings on 9/08, 4:06pm)




Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.