About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Monday, October 1, 2007 - 8:03amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I thought I would post this definition from the first page of the first chapter of the book for discussion.  A quick and humorous read, Your Guide to Slide: The Slacker's Guide to College left me with mixed emotions.  I found myself often sympathizing with the author's point of view regarding finding the least onerous path to get a degree.  As for the endless partying and other mooching hedonism he advocated as proper ways to spend that newly created free time, I could have done without those aspects.

Based on this definition, however, I definitely qualify as a slacker in a number of ways I will not articulate here.

(Edited by Luke Setzer on 10/01, 8:04am)




Post 1

Monday, October 1, 2007 - 7:23pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
There is a short story by Heinlein called something like "The Man who was too Lazy to Fail." I think most O'ists would enjoy that story.

Ted



Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 7:54amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
From Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Enough_for_Love comes this:
The Tale of the Man Who Was Too Lazy to Fail concerns a 20th-century U.S. Navy cadet who manages to move up the ranks while avoiding any semblance of real work by applying himself wholeheartedly to the principle of "constructive laziness." The events and descriptions parallel Heinlein's own Navy career. After the Naval Academy the protagonist becomes rich by taking advantage of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which paid farmers not to farm their land. Heinlein disdained government interference in business, especially in the form of handouts, and the level of taxation necessary to sustain such programs.
This sounds like a good read.  Thanks for the tip, Ted.




Post 3

Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 9:18amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Time Enough for Love is quite a grand story.  It refers to events that happened in earlier books with Lazarus Long and his family as protagonists.  The whole timeline is confusing, so I am not sure which books should be read prior, but Time Enough is so good that one can skip the other books and get right into it without losing much.

Ted




Post 4

Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 5:38amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I disagree, the quote is to good for the word . Some folks call me a slacker or a 'company man' because when I find an easier way to do my job I use it. As I get older and become more a creature of comfort I remember an executive giving a talk to the work force at a profit sharing meeting and he stated 'we should work smarter not harder' [Robert Rotundo].  The slacker is a second hander a person that preys on others a con artist a wheedler,a guy who begs for toilet paper when he already has six rolls stashed,a king rat.  This may not be the proper place to state this but I have came to believe this after analyzing Ayn Rands definition of selfishness. There is a difference between selfishness and self-intoxication{self induced ego inflation maybe narcissism} I like keeping my feet on the ground so to speak.Part of remaining "selfish"  is refusing to submit to idolatry.It is better to sift through the opinions , inferences and get to the facts.        



Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.