The Desperate Defense of Obamacare
by Tibor R. Machan

The political arena has abandoned all civility, it seems. It was coming
our way once folks like Ralph Nader and Michael Moore got to be big wigs,
speaking up in support of populism and a massive federal government. 

The American citizenry tends to be middle of the road, championing a mixed
economy but resisting either extensive statism or full freedom from
coercive government. Most people seem to want the chance to get government
to do their special bidding, so they will not sign up to restrain its
powers completely. Neither, however, will they grant the government all
the powers its most avid advocates would like. I have in mind the likes of
Chuck Shumer and Henry Waxman among the Democrat politicians and some of
the Republicans who border on authoritarianism.

But these days if you opposed government health care, you are a right-wing
lunatic, a wild person or barbarian so there is no use trying to argue with
those who are committed to socialize the American medical system. They
have dismissed all serious skeptics. The train must not be stopped as it
is hurling toward full government involvement in all areas of society, at
every level. This may not be objected to without getting those who love it
to call you names and flatly ignore your concerns. Only compromisers will
get some attention since they don't question the policies at their
foundations.

I am a regular reader of the center left magazine The New Republic and
even it is having a hard time remaining somewhat civil about opponents of
President Obama's mission. In a recent issue the editors jump on board
with those who have declare Americans who fervently oppose Obama's health
care and insurance plans as racists of some kind. The writers said they
don't much worry about this racism but insisted that it was that, not bona
fide political disagreement about the direction the federal government is
taking under this president. And The New York Review of Books, which I
also read regularly, has rolled out Elizabeth Drew who tries to tarnish
everyone who doesn't genuflect at the altar of medical statism.

Some in this administration are really quite un-American, seriously! I
have in mind, among others, Obama's regulatory czar, Professor Cass
Sunstein, who believes that (a) government is the source of our rights and
(b) government should grant animals rights of the sort human beings have. 

This is no small matter. After all, what is distinctive about the American
political tradition is what it says in the Declaration of Independence,
namely, that the rights everyone has, every human being, are ours by
virtue of the fact that we are human beings. All of us, except the
hopelessly incapacitated, have these rights, yet Professor Sunstein and his
boss, we may assume, think that governments, in the fashion of monarchs of
days gone by, hand out rights, meaning, grant privileges or permissions.
(I always cringe when people say "Government allows us to...." because
government as the American Founders and their teachers knew haven't any
magical powers to allow anyone anything.) Government doesn't stand to us,
the citizenry, as parents and nannies stand to children. Government is a
group of hired administrators, not czars, kings or Caesars.

So when this president eagerly endorses the views of people such as
Sunstein as he is charging ahead with transforming the country into
something it had vehemently gotten away from when it was founded,
opposition should be expected. And some of it will be loud, even a bit
unruly. 

Instead, however, of laying out a set of reasons for why this change ought
to be undertaken and communicating them to us all, the critics are being
denigrated, dismissed, and besmirched as right-wingers (which is a term
that by rights should apply to people like Mussolini, Hitler and perhaps
Peron, not to the likes of George Will and Dick Army). I am certainly no
right-winger myself, having had a solid taste of Nazism in my early life.
Nazism, by the way, refers to a German political party that worked to
establish national socialism, not a system of private health care that's
averse to collectivizing medicine.

But perhaps the hysterical attitude toward all who question Mr. Obama's
rush to massive statism carries an implicitly hopeful message. The ideas
behind this march are bankrupt so its champions will not talk them up.
Instead they have to demonize those who are skeptical. 

The Promise of Liberty: A Non-Utopian Vision (Hardcover)
by Tibor R. Machan  

Discuss this Article (6 messages)