Ayn Rand/Objectivism Sightings
Free Radical Updates
Local Club Meeting Plans
News & Interesting Links
Of Excellence And Excrement
We see ourselves most emphatically - unlike TOC - as being at war with the current culture: the culture of anti-heroes, nihilism & destruction. Hence a significant, but not exclusive, emphasis on esthetics. (SOLO Credo)
Art. The sphere of the passions & the spirit the _expression of & window to our souls. The source of spiritual fuel. If our battle is, as I quoted Nathaniel Branden at the outset, primarily a spiritual one, then we will surely want to enlist the aid of art for nourishment, just as surely as well want to smite the artistic poseurs who bottle their urine or frame their faeces & call that art. By smite I dont mean ban; I mean create a culture in which it wouldnt occur to anyone that he could perpetrate such fraud & be taken seriously, let alone richly rewarded.
Now Ayn Rand didnt mention esthetics on the famous occasion where she was challenged to describe the essence of her philosophy while standing on one foot. Perhaps thats because she needed to bring the other foot back down in a hurry! Certainly none spoke more powerfully about the power & sweep of art, & none attacked the contemporary cultural sewer more vehemently, than she. Here she is in The Romantic Manifesto:
As a child, I saw a glimpse of the pre-World War One world, the last afterglow of the most radiant cultural atmosphere in human history If one has glimpsed that kind of art - & wider: the possibility of that kind of culture one is unable to be satisfied with anything less. I must emphasise that I am not speaking of concretes, nor of politics, nor of journalistic trivia, but of that periods sense of life. Its art projected an overwhelming sense of intellectual freedom, of depth, i.e., concern with fundamental problems, of demanding standards, of inexhaustible originality, of unlimited possibilities &, above all, of profound respect for man. The existential atmosphere (which was then being destroyed by Europes philosophical trends & political systems) still held a benevolence that would be incredible to the men of today, i.e., a smiling, confident good will of man to man, & of man to life. It is impossible for the young people of today to grasp the reality of mans higher potential & what scale of achievement it had reached in a rational (or semi-rational) culture. But I have seen it. I know that it was real, that it existed, that it is possible. It is that knowledge that I want to hold up to the sight of men over the brief span of less than a century before the barbarian curtain descends altogether (if it does) & the last memory of mans greatness vanishes in another Dark Ages.
Lets recapture for a moment the sense of life of the period Ayn Rand was talking about via the medium of music & contrast it with todays via the medium of what some call music but what I call headbanging caterwauling, right out of the sewer. The first is from 19th century Viennese operetta; its the music I used to open my Politically Incorrect radio show with a selection of melodies from Die Fledermaus by Johann Strauss. Strauss was a pop idol of his time who set the world dancing; so too is the person whos going to follow him, a pop idol of our time who sets the world dancing. The sense-of-life contrast couldnt be starker. Remember as you listen, Rands admonition: What an artwork expresses is, This is life as I see it.
(Die Fledermaus; Eminem, Drug Song)
Now perhaps you can better understand why Ayn Rand said, I am not willing to surrender the world to the jerky contortions of self-inducedly brainless bodies with empty eye sockets who perform in stinking basements the immemorial rituals of staving off terror, which are a dime a dozen in any jungle - & to the quavering witch doctors who call it art.
Good for her! And I want SOLO to do its part in seeing that the world is not surrendered to such animals & their excrement. (In this regard, I couldnt be more pleased to have as a guest speaker at this inaugural SOLO conference, painter Michael Newberry, fresh from smiting some post-modern dragons. Ill leave it for him to tell you all about that.)
But theres a problem here. Talk in these terms & folk get very defensive & upset. First, they think youre attacking them personally & go into typical modern era cry-baby Im so offended mode; second, they think youre arguing that the excrement be banned.
(Actually, perhaps you are attacking them personally, if youre attacking excrement & they like excrement. Youre telling them they like excrement. By extension they might infer that youre saying they are excrement. Well, if the crap fits !!)
Luckily for them they have a fallback position, which, though they still go through the motions of being so offended, they seize upon gleefully. Ayn Rand herself. Did she not say, At present our understanding of music is confined to the gathering of material, i.e., to the level of descriptive observations. Until it is brought to the stage of conceptualisation, we have to treat musical tastes or preferences as a subjective matter not in the metaphysical but in the epistemological sense; i.e., not in the sense that these preferences are in fact, causeless & arbitrary, but in the sense that we do not know their cause. No one, therefore, can claim the objective superiority of his choices over the choices of others. Where no objective proof is available, its every man for himself - & only for himself?
Did she not say that? Well, yes she did. She also said that she was talking physiologically. She went on to say that there was, nonetheless, a great deal one could observe on the psychological & existential levels. For instance: The deadly monotony of primitive music the endless repetition of a few notes & of a rhythmic pattern that beats against the brain with the regularity of the ancient torture of water drops falling on a mans skull paralyses cognitive processes, obliterates awareness & disintegrates the mind. And she observed, The products of Americas anti-rational, anti-cognitive Progressive education, the hippies, are reverting to the music & the drumbeat of the jungle. Today, I would say the same of the MTV generation. And I have no hesitation in saying that anyone who says he gets an exalted sense-of-life reaction to that stuff is in that instance at least sub-human. I am the first one to ask, Where is the animality in man? when it comes to countering Objectivist flights of rationalistic fantasy, but to call this musical maggotry animalistic is an insult to animals.
I quote my radio editorial of July 11, 2000:
One of the most terrible paradoxes of our time is that human reason, our distinctive tool of survival, is committing suicide. Human reason devises exquisite technologies which it then deploys to kill itself. Modern pop culture is a case in point, where sophisticated electronic instruments & amplification equipment are used to create dissonant, ugly cacophonies which batter the brain into a state of catatonia. Yes, catatonia, defined in my dictionary as "a form of schizophrenia characterised by stupor, with outbreaks of excitement."
During my recent stint in the United States, on a web site called newcriterion.com, I read about a New York Times review of a concert by a hard-rock band called Slipknot, described by the reviewer, Neil Strauss, as "one of the most exciting & enigmatic of rock's current crop of new bands." Mr Strauss recounts how the group drove its fans into a frenzy with some preliminary "ferocious screaming." "Two teenagers had already been treated for injuries before Slipknot had even finished thrashing, banging & raging through its first song about exploding angst," he writes. "Teenage angst demands its anti-heroes, & in the absence of any other popular music uprising since grunge these acts have made it exciting again to grow up a rock fan."
Now what, you may ask, does any of this have to do with individual liberty? Am I implying that musical atrocities like Slipknot should be banned? Quite the contrary - I believe everybody should be free to pursue his own tastes, even if they are too abysmal to be called "tastes." But it's important to realise that not only governments can threaten freedom - freedom is also threatened by a culture of grunge, angst & anti-heroes. Freedom is inseparably linked to reason - & proponents of reason, in their reverence for life, concern themselves with beauty, life-affirmation & heroism. Only so much coexistence is possible between these conflicting sets of values - or rather, these values & anti-values - before one of them breaks down.
Mr Strauss quotes Slipknot's drummer as saying, "A guy at Sony told us, 'If this is the future of music, I don't want to be alive.' I just thought, if that's what he thinks, then we are doing something right." Seldom is the snide nihilism of our times expressed so candidly. And just as this snide nihilism revels in death & destruction, so too it has no qualms about dictatorship.
Ladies & gentlemen, the price of liberty is eternal vigilance - & the anti-liberty state of our culture has never merited more vigilance than right now.
To quote from a different editorial, Mollifying Marcus in FreeRad 46: Heres how it works: respect for reason gives rise to respect for the right to exercise it freedom. See Ancient Greece, the Renaissance, the 19th century. Freedom gives rise to prosperity & enormous diversity, including ideas & art works that are inimical to it. Against such ideas & art, while defending to the death their right to exist, we should be eternally vigilant.
I exhorted Objectivists then & I do it again now - to get out there in the marketplace & promote good art as zealously as you promote good philosophy, both being necessary for the preservation of freedom. The tide is against us at the moment wherever we turn our ears are assaulted by jungle cacophony of the kind weve just heard. In the visual realm well, weve just been reading on the SOLO Forum about the Canadian artist I alluded to earlier who won a prestigious award for ejaculating into vials; there was the Turner Award in Britain, recently bestowed on someone whose artwork was a room with an electric light in it. These abominations are a dime a dozen right now; it is, as I often say, the Age of Crap. I want SOLO to wage a cultural war on it every bit as relentless as the physical War on Terrorism.
Discuss this Article (27 messages)