About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadPage 0Page 1Forward one pageLast Page


Post 0

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 1:18amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The likeness is not exact (I've done portraits, and I never get them quite right myself. I don't know how those guys at the mall do it!) but the rendering is excellent. You've got skills, Boston.

Post 1

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 3:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mmmmm mmm good! If he were my man, I'd give you a million for it. Gorgeous! 

Post 2

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 5:02pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks, Joe, and since you bring it up with enough of an eye to notice, I admit I wasn't quite going for exactitude since I made his head more symmetrical than it actually is, and I emphasized certain qualities Michael Jordan has . In my portrait work, I've always tried to capture a face, no doubt, but also to add my own take on it.
(Edited by Bosch Fawstin
on 8/16, 5:09pm)


Post 3

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 5:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Now That is a compliment, thanks Teresa.


(Edited by Bosch Fawstin
on 8/16, 5:06pm)


Post 4

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 5:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Boston, that's actually quite interesting, really. It reminds me of Rand's ideas about art being an ideal versus a literal reproduction. And I thought that Iylanna's(?) portrait of Rand was a little idealized in that sense as well, it didn't look exactly like Rand, yet it did...your Jordan does seem a little in that area...very much like a Nubian prince. (On the flip side, there's a certain look to Michael Jordan that I like, a certain "mischevious twinkle" in his eyes...he does something playful with his smile that keeps him from being snotty, at least that's my interpretation.)

I have a question for you, since you draw comics, also: Do you find it easier to reproduce a comic character's face than a real person's portrait? I can do a good Peter Parker, but if I were to draw a real life Peter Parker, it wouldn't come out the same...

Shine On!

Post 5

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 6:23pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Great work Bosch. I like it.

Sorry, can't offer you the million though ;-)


Post 6

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 6:41pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I have to ask, Joe, why Boston? I'm originally from the Bronx.

Anyway, I'd say that drawing a stylized comic book character is easier if we're talking one drawing, but then I will have to draw that character over and over again in a variety of ways: full bodied movement to emotional expression where the drawings could add up to hundreds, especially in the preliminary drawings. And in drawing a realistic representational portrait, I have direct reference which I rely on and it's usually without any expression.
Adding to that, the face of the main character in my book, William Howland of Table for One, was based on James Dean, particularly his bone structure. James Dean had the kind of face that has stayed with me every since I first saw it and I knew that I'd use it one day for a character of mine. If you look at Dean's face, it looks as if it was created by an artist, it has that kind of stylized symmetry about it. But even though Dean was the source for my character, it's more of a short hand version of it and it may not be obvious if you don't know before hand.

Post 7

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 6:43pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Marcus, thanks, and I'll break down and settle for less than a million.



Post 8

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 6:44pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thought I recognized Will.

---Landon


Post 9

Tuesday, August 16, 2005 - 10:54pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sorry, Bosch.I read really fast and I think I joined your first and last names together...don't take it personal, your not the first person I've misidentified on Solo. A strange habit of mine.

Anyway, thanks for sharing your trade secrets. I always find it interesting to see how others approach it.

Post 10

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 12:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
No problem at all, Jeff, and since I now know it's a habit of yours I can't take it personally.





Post 11

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 12:43amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
You know, I hate the name Joe, so Jeff is fine with me ;).

Post 12

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 12:51amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Say it ain't so Joe.

Post 13

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 1:51amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Sorry, just never liked it.

Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 14

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 3:23pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
You're not happy about being "just a guy named Joe?"

Again no one is going to get that joke but me but it was worth it. ;)

---Landon


Post 15

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 3:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
It's from a song, right?

Joe blow, Joe shmo, average Joe, hey joe, where you going with that Gun in your hand, whatcha know Jow (I don't know nothing), G.I. JOE! (ok, I like that one), I've heard em all.

I don't even like the syllable, it's so unpoetic, so crude. No art to it. Joseph's alright, too formal, though.

The only reason I'm a Joe is because my father and his father were Joes.Damn tradition. Damn Catholics.

I like the Indian idea of getting two names upon adulthood. That's why my handle's Spaceplayer. First choice was Max Power. But Homer Simpson claimed that one.

Post 16

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 3:56pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I thought you'd be able to catch my Ditkophile reference.  Just a guy named Joe was the name of the last Spider-Man story Ditko ever worked on.  The idea was this guy named Joe Smith was a total looser who just wanted to be famous, be the champ... he could never manage it and never get a break, he then got superpowers which drastically changed his disposition... he was this total mediocrity who all the sudden was a serious threat to Spider-Man who took out his envy on everyone.  Kind of a prototype for some of his later villains.

And cheer up at least you're not named after I was a teenage werewolf (ok it was really little house on the prarie but my version's funnier).

I'm just now realizing I haven't really commented on the piece itself though.  Tight rendering, good use of color good pallette, you ever consider using this technique for covers Bosch?

---Landon


Post 17

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 4:09pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
See, why does the name Joe get associated with characters like that! :P I would never take my problems out on Spiderman. Damn you, Ditko.

Post 18

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 4:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Could take it as a compliment.

Then again probably not... sorry. ;)

---Landon


Post 19

Wednesday, August 17, 2005 - 4:36pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
You're not happy about being "just a guy named Joe?"

Again no one is going to get that joke but me but it was worth it. ;)

I got the joke right away, Landon. And I always love an excuse to post Ditko art:

By the way, I liked I Was a Teenage Werewolf. Don't consider this an endorsement, though. I was just a kid when I saw it.



Post to this threadPage 0Page 1Forward one pageLast Page


User ID Password or create a free account.