About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, December 23, 2005 - 8:08amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ah, but what did you think of the rest of the exhibit? ;-)

Post 1

Saturday, December 24, 2005 - 6:37amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ah, that was several years ago...remember there were lots of people there. I've always liked Gauguin's portraits of simple Tahiti natives (not the ones with complicated mystic themes). They are earthy, robust, serene, and completely unpretentious. They might be considered exotic to the then Europeans, but are closer to me than the typical figures in the western art. In that particular exhibit though, I saw a few of his still lifes probably for the first time (or I hadn't pay attention before), and was amazed at how robust and full of life they were, almost like his nude Tahitis. (No, this is not evident in this painting but in some others I saw at the exhibit). 
(Edited by Hong Zhang on 12/24, 6:40am)


Post 2

Saturday, December 24, 2005 - 7:17amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for putting up with me, Hong. :-) You wrote:

I've always liked Gauguin's portraits of simple Tahiti natives (not the ones with complicated mystic themes). They are earthy, robust, serene, and completely unpretentious. They might be considered exotic to the then Europeans, but are closer to me than the typical figures in the western art.


Paul Gauguin made an interesting choice in life, to say the least. He turned his back on Western civilization in order to -- how can I put this delicately? -- drownd himself in hot naked underage Polynesian chicks. ;-) As I said, interesting...

I think Gauguin is a somewhat crude painter, but with a pretty good sense of color (as you alluded to), and unusual, exotic subject matter. He may have been flat-out lazy in his work owing to too much of at least some version of paradise. I once saw an exhibit of his where at least one painting (I think a mother and daughter facing straight out) was pretty sophisticated, and seemed to show great talent. But most of his paintings are at least distinctive and compelling. 



Post 3

Saturday, December 31, 2005 - 11:48amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hi Andre,
Paul Gauguin made an interesting choice in life, to say the least....As I said, interesting...

I'd be intereted to know what exactly do you want to say here? ;-) 

"I think Gauguin is a somewhat crude painter...."
 Perhaps you are right. All his paintings I've seen are kind of flat, not much of perspective. But I am in no position to judge technically.

"He may have been flat-out lazy in his work owing to too much of at least some version of paradise."

Ah, how could one blame him if this was indeed the case?!
(Edited by Hong Zhang on 12/31, 11:48am)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.