| | Luke,
I like the title and the art concept. The only way to get a better title would be to excerpt the best terse phrase in your book. The art idea is good, but it needs much better execution. I would also not have two individuals on the cover. If they are both on the front then the forms will be too crowded. If one's on the front and one on the back it seems like tokenism to include the second sex.
You might also consider using a child instead of an adult, if that doesn't clash too much with your content. A baby can be sex neutral, and more unexpected and so attention-grabbing. The execution of a child would be much more difficult though.
Another concept might be the view of a man in the foreground, off center and facing away into a landscape with a beautiful city on the horizon.
I would omit the hyphen from the title as well, especially on the cover. While technically grammatically correct, it interrupts the flow as if the vision were an alternative of driven life thus:
"The Vision ~ Driven Life"
As for the title being a cliché, that will only matter if the text doesn't live up to it. It is a long tradition to re-use a title, but with a twist, for rhetorical purposes. Ever heard of The Romantic Manifesto?
Teresa,
I have long said, using "want" in the sense of lack:
The world is my oyster, I shall not want.
Perhaps a rewrite of the psalm would be good for the back cover? I don't know the rest of the psalm, so I don't know how easy it would be to adapt. And your Soviet caveat is apropos, but I think it is more a matter of execution again.
Ted
|
|