About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, August 15, 2003 - 3:59amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for this article!
With a reservation though:
"Now and then I think the Nobel Prize is misdirected to the pure scientists, who are having so much fun already, leaving the practical implementers less prominently acknowledged."

Just because a scientist in "basic research" enjoys what he does, his achievements do not need to be acknowledged!!!! Are you implying that a scientist in "applied research" enjoys his/her work less and therefore deserves more praise!!!!

I agree that "applied research" could be praised more, but often this is for a reason. Whereas the details of "basic research" are immediately published and made open to the public, the results of "applied research" can be announced to the press, but the exact details are not normally disclosed nor attributed to specific individuals in order to protect the Companies technological edge. This makes it harder to award specific individuals for these accomplishments.

Post 1

Monday, May 3, 2004 - 7:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I haven't read this whole article and was only reviewing it in the process of updating my boss, Robert Flashman's vita (selected citations). Skipping down to where my bosses, Bob Flashman and Sam Quick were mentioned, I find that they are being called Luddites. I think you're reading things into the "Simply Beautiful" publication that aren't there. Simplifying your life does not mean running technology out of it, and I think Bob and Sam would be among the first to tell you that. It does mean reducing your clutter, deciding what is really important to you, and making the decision to avoid doing those things that are not meaningful to you. Technology could help or hinder you in doing this; you have to make your own decisions about that. I don't see how saying this makes them Luddites.

The reasoning being used in the section of this article that I did read reminds me of today's political debates. Even intelligent people don't seem to want to talk reasonably, but prefer casting aspersions and reading things into other's motivations that simply aren't there. This applies to both sides. We would be better off if we could talk reasonably and not demonize people without being sure what they're really thinking.

I'm glad that today's technology has provided healing to you. Bob and Sam, I am certain, would be glad of that, also.

Alex Lesueur, Jr.
University of Kentucky


Post 2

Tuesday, May 4, 2004 - 7:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'd like to add one other thing. I've been on the University of Oregon's website and did see an article on simple living that I found extreme; this one writer's view of the model American family for the future seemed to me quite a joyless vision. The fact that "Simply Beautiful" is posted alongside it does not mean that these articles or their authors agree with each other. The fact that these articles were both chosen for inclusion on their website really doesn't say anything about our agreement or disagreement with their work. It also doesn't mean that the people at the University of Oregon aren't contributing anything of value. There is a need for balance.

Alex Lesueur, Jr.
University of Kentucky


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.