About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, November 7, 2003 - 3:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"There's a television cartoon called Futurama that I want to talk about. At times it's hilarious, and the half hour shows are packed pretty tight."

Although the Simpsons and Futurama are obviously meant to be satire, the characters in these shows are thoroughly depressing. They always seem to wallow in there own misery. Homer of the Simpsons and the Robot in Futurama especially. They constantly whine about their lives that always come to nothing or celebrate absurd pathetic victories like being able to dislodge a chocolate bar from an automatic dispenser.
I think Matt Groening has made a career out of making people laugh at the trivial and mundane in life - with nothing else to offer. The philosophy of his stories is that there are bad things that happen to people in life that are unavoidable. If they except their pathetic lot in life then they will be happy. So I am not at all surprised that during "freedom day" his characters blindly accepted it when their bones were broken by strangers.
You could just imagine Homer after recieving a broken bone going cross eyed, crying "Doh", and then moaning about how unfair it all is after it is clear that he is powerless to change it.

Post 1

Friday, November 7, 2003 - 5:16amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
We have freedom day every day. Consider this:

What is your property? Is it an objective fact or an arbitrary convention? If the government changes the assignment of ownership of a fraction of your bank account (i.e. taxes you), is it now someone else’s property? If you stop “the other” from using and disposing of that property are you violating their freedom? If the 1% wealthiest retain their income, are they taking it from the poor?

In the cartoon, there is an implicit rule: the person who pushes first is the one with a claim to the freedom. In the mind of the socialist, there is an implicit rule: the larger gang gets the freedom.

The cartoon is on to deep truth about current affairs. Excellent commentary!

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Saturday, April 23, 2011 - 10:49pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
There is another problem with the idea that "Freedom Day" means that people are free to do whatever they want including attacking other people. If you attack others, aren't you interfering with their freedom? Aren't you violating the very principle that you claim to be expressing and upholding? If the goal is perfect freedom, doesn't that require an abstention from the initiation of force and violence? It is absolutely bewildering to me how the authors of something called "Freedom Day" could think otherwise.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.