About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 20

Monday, May 24, 2004 - 10:21pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Orion,

Good article, but I did want to correct a misapprehension you had about the Sikhs. They are not pro-Muslim, but were originally founded to combat the Muslims.

When Islam began to carve its bloody way through South Asia (by the very early 13th century,) the big military advantage it had over the native Hindu kingdoms was that every Muslim man could take up a sword for jihad, whereas the Hindus had an elaborate caste system in which only members of the second highest caste were allowed to fight. The best of the Hindu armies were man-for-man better trained and organized than the mobs of Islamic fighters, especially in cavalry, but were overwhelmed by superior numbers. This situation went on for years as Islam seized control of all northern India.

Finally, as Hindus woke up to the military reality, a new sect came into being in northwest India, near the area of initial Islamic penetration. These were Hindus who eliminated the caste restrictions when it came to fighting Muslims. R. R. Colton and Joel Palmer write "The Sikhs, who had originated in the fifteenth century as a reform movement in Hinduism, went to war with the Mogul [i.e. Muslim] emperor in the seventeenth century. They became one of the most ferociously warlike of Indian peoples." [_A History of the Modern World_, 5th ed., 1978, p. 264.] They were one of the forces that stopped Islamic expansion on the subcontinent.

Mutual antipathy developed between pacifistic, vegetarian, orthodox Hinduism on the one hand, and Sikhism, with its sword-swinging, gun-shooting ways, on the other, The Sikhs broke away from Hinduism and claimed to compose a separate religion, though Hinduism continued to consider Sikhism a Hindu sect.

Later, there were groups of Sikhs who required every boy upon reaching manhood to carry a long arm. Upon being confirmed in the faith, each swore an oath "never to speak a word of greeting to a Hindu, and to shoot any Muslim on sight."

To this day, adult male Sikhs are required to carry a ceremonial knife or sword on their persons at all times. (One of the current grievances of American Sikhs is that post-9/11 they are no longer allowed to carry this ceremonial weapon on commercial airplanes.)

In the 19th century, the British Empire in India was saved by Sikh warriors from the Punjab, who rallied to suppress the "Sepoy Mutiny" among the Hindu and Muslim troops of the British East India Company.

In the 20th century, India's socialist Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by Sikh members of her own bodyguard.

In the 21st century, British-born Sikh Gurinder K. Chadha co-wrote and directed the greatest sense-of-life motion picture of recent years, "Bend It Like Beckham." In this film, actress Parminder K. Nagra portrays Jesminder K. Bhamra, a young Sikh woman establishing her independence from her tradition-minded parents while coming of age in suburban London. (The prevalence of the initial "K." in the two preceeding sentences is due to all Sikh women having the same middle name: "Kaur", Punjabi for "Princess.")

Okay, that was just a few thoughts on Sikhs through the ages...

-Bill

Post 21

Monday, May 24, 2004 - 11:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
William,

Wow.  I don't know what to say.  That was very helpful information, considering the present war on terrorism... I honestly did not know all that.  That was brilliant.

Now, after reading your commentary, as I sit here considering that there are so many societies (besides India and its Sikhs) over the past centuries that have had to deal with the Islamic threat, why isn't there more unity against it now?

I keep saying this, but I really think that the arguments of Objectivism are most likely the civilized world's most effective antidote to not just the present terrorism of Islam, but also the other ever-present menaces of governmental and generalized religious control of world societies, and the exercise and awakening of individual, logic-based thought and life. 


Post 22

Tuesday, May 25, 2004 - 1:02amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Very interesting article post about the Sikhs. But you missed out how in modern times, Sikhs turned to terrorism. In fact Sikhs carried out the second-worst terrorist attack, when an Indian airliner was bombed over the Atlantic, killing 329 people.
The Sikhs had legitimate grievances against India, and were fighting for their freedom. But the Air India bombing and other attacks show that the Sikhs had the potential to become terrorists. It just shows that all religions have the potential to cause terrible atrocities.

Post 23

Tuesday, May 25, 2004 - 3:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Philip,

You wrote:
It just shows that all religions have the potential to cause terrible atrocities.
Agreed.  Good point about the terrorism.

My post was just to add a little detail to the picture of Sikhism, and to distinguish it from Islam.

-Bill


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.