| | Kelly, thanks for the article and welcome to SOLO! Your words sang a song in my own heart -- one which I had only been "humming" lately (I had forgot some of the words). Thanks for reminding me of the truly sublime that is before me--on my computer screen.
I can often be dry, hyper-rational, and aloof but--properly inspired by beauty in the world--I have my "moments" of ecstatic joy in a sudden awareness of wondrous beautitude. You have sparked one of these moments in me.
I really appreciate 2 things most about SOLO: its embodied life-affirming sentiment, and its potentiality for positive change in the culture at large.
Embodied life-affirming sentiment: As I said above, your words expressed what I had in my heart. Your words EMBODIED my sentiments. I find that this validating connection to others is quite rare in our culture, but not so at SOLO.
In this respect, another's words (especially here) can be like art: "a concretized projection of [life-affirming] values." Great art is beautiful, and what is beautiful is both true and good (goodness and truth being the 2 main, if not only, ingredients of "beauty").
Quoting Rand again, when I read your pleasantly gracious words (and your awareness of the Good), I became aware of "the life-giving fact of experiencing a moment of metaphysical joy--a moment of love for existence." In short, I had one of those "this-is-what-life-means-to-me" experiences--thanks!
Potentiality for positive change: The other aspect of SOLO which I love is its cosmopolitan-version of similar value seeking (such an array of different folks--all realizing, for the most part, the same true good).
Using a salient point from MacIntyre, I had argued once that SOLO is the most important website in the world. I think it's an appropriate time to restate SOLO's relation to his political "solution" for the problem of the inaccurate aim of contemporary politics (from Aristotle: the aim of politics is to make us all happier--if it doesn't do this we're doing something wrong).
After lambasting contemporary politics, MacIntyre states a solution to the problem:
"What is lacking in modern political societies is any type of institutional arena in which plain persons ... are able to engage together in systematic reasoned debate ... on how to answer questions about the relationship of politics to the claims of rival and alternative ways of life, each with its own conception of the virtues and the ... good."
Upon stating this the first time to an intellectual opponent, I had challenged my opponent to find a website which "outdoes" SOLO as an "arena [where] plain persons ... engage together in systematic rational debate ... to answer questions about ... the relationship of politics to ... the virtues and the ... good." He had no answer--no forum seems to capture this "solution" as well as SOLO does. I find this still true today.
Thanks, Kelly, for causing me to remember that which deserves to be. Ed (Edited by Ed Thompson on 3/21, 1:29am)
|
|