[an error occurred while processing this directive]
About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 1:06amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Mr. Younkins -- you always do an excellent job of taking large intellectual works and summarizing their content.  I know this is just the typical "good job" post that usually follows whenever you post one of your summaries but I'm happy to have the opportunity to do it myself since I have found your summaries to be extremely useful.

 - Jason




Post 1

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 1:26amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"Sciabarra stops short of developing his own substantive dialectical libertarian social theory."

Well, if he didn't, he would have no time to spin his songs of the day! Someone's gotta get the booty moving!



Post 2

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 2:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"The problem occurs when Marx steps into the future to evaluate the present. He assumes the information needed by future planners will be available, despite the fact that these planners will have destroyed the context (i.e., the price system) which permits such information to be generated and socially traded. By holding this incorrect assumption, Marx is placing himself outside the historical process that he analyzes."

E-fuckin'-xactly!

They *all* do it. They treat their current context as if it were axiomatic. Then they posit their theories without regard to their destruction. It's Rand's thing about treating factories and superhighways as natural phenomena. Just assume it. Everthing else will be ok. Eveything else will follow.

Screw 'em! How about a little capital accumulation? How about the freedom that makes that possible? Blank out.

Ross



Post 3

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 2:09amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Furthermore, those Marxist pricks were thick! Despite all their convoluted arguments and dissertations, they were just plain dumb! All they had was invective.

It served them well. It murdered millions. Now, *that* should be instructive as to the power of ideas.

Ross

(Christ, if I edit this thing one more time, I'll become a Marxist!)
(Edited by Ross Elliot
on 8/18, 2:10am)

(Edited by Ross Elliot
on 8/18, 2:13am)




Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 4

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 5:36amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hey, thanks Ed, for the review!  Since Total Freedom is the culmination of my trilogy, it's nice that your review has been posted during what is the tenth anniversary of the first two books of that trilogy:  Marx, Hayek, and Utopia, which was published ten years ago today---August 18, 1995, and Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical, which was published in the same 1995 week.

Two points:

1.  It is true that I didn't develop a formal "Sciabarraian" dialectical social theory in my trilogy, but there is an implicit parallel of sorts, between my own work and the work of somebody like Isaiah Berlin.  Now, I'm not comparing myself to Berlin (some love him, some hate him) or to Berlin's history of voluminous writing.  Moreover, I disagree with a lot of what Berlin has written.

But something of Berlin's "approach" was imparted to me through my Marxist mentor Bertell Ollman, who was himself taught by Berlin.  One of the things I learned was that if I wanted to do intellectual history, I could express my own substantive views through my interpretation of the views of others.  While my trilogy does not offer a substantive social theory, it is interpretive, methodological, and historical, and one can glean where I stand by the enthusiasm that I bring to my reconstruction of Rand's "tri-level model" (in Part Three of Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical) and of Rothbard's "structural" critique (discussed in Chapter 7 of Total Freedom). 

2.  I think of my own essays on domestic and foreign policy as applications of the tri-level Randian model that I discuss in Russian Radical, and that I endorse, while being fully cognizant of important insights from other theorists as well (including Menger, Mises, Hayek, and Rothbard).  Some day, when I finish a whole host of planned articles, I hope to return to the enunciation of a more formal "Sciabarraian" social theory. But before I can do that, I need to work on a much more accessible exposition of dialectical method.  Though I defend my own ability to speak "Polish," as Linz has put it (that is, to situate myself in some very technical contemporary debates on methodology), I also believe that the time is ripe for extended essays on "The Art of Context-Keeping"---essays that not only present "Dialectics for Dummies" (so-to-speak), but that integrate and illustrate the concrete practice of the art.

Thanks again, Ed!

(Edited by sciabarra on 8/18, 5:37am)




Post 5

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 8:52amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
... essays that not only present "Dialectics for Dummies" ...
Is that for the context-impaired?

Pssst, Happy 10th anniversary!






Post 6

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 8:57amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit


Really Ross, vituperation is one thing, but this:


Furthermore, those Marxist pricks were thick!

;-)




Post 7

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 9:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Chris,

Congrats on your anniversary.  You've achieved much.  Your trilogy will stand the test of time as a fine piece of work, despite any reservations from ARI.  Don't beat yourself up for what you haven't done. 

I enjoyed your essay "Total Freedom" and Ed's review of it. In just identifying the problem, you've done more for libertarians than any current "leader" in the movement and have also done no harm which is more than can be said for the likes of Lew Rockwell.

cheers,

bob




Post 8

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 5:47amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"my own essays on domestic and foreign policy"

Chris -- Is there a webpage where links to your essays are provided?  Sounds like they would be good reading.  Thanks.




Post 9

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 12:20pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks to the well-wishers here.  :)

Jay, I'm usually characterized as a bit of a "links-whore" here.  So, in upholding my reputation, let me provide you with the following links, where you may read more of my stuff:

My "Dialectics and Liberty" Website (easy to remember as chrismatthewsciabarra.com or chrissciabarra.com )
My Essays Page (which includes links to all available online essays)
My SOLO HQ/Free Radical Page (which includes links specifically to essays published in those forums)
My Notablog (easy to remember as notablog.net).  I readily open up entries there to comments, except for my regular "Song of the Day" entries that are never open to debate. :)

A few links to interviews were posted this week at Notablog, including An Interview Conducted by Sébastien Caré, and one posted today, An Interview at Sunni's Salon.

Enjoy...




Post 10

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 12:48pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for the links.  (I see you've been busy. . . .)  Is there an Objectivist way to say "God bless the Internet"?



Post 11

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 5:01pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thank you Jason:

The reason I summarize such large works is so that I can keep track of the author's essential ideas. I can get lost if I don't do that!  :)

Chris:

When I saw that you were being commended for the 10th birthday  of  2 of your three children,  I thought it would be a nice touch to post a summary of your youngest and most precocious child, Total Freedom, who is only five.

Maybe you and Leonard Peikoff can collaborate on a book called "The Dialectical One in the Many".

Robert:

Thanks. I am pleased you like my review.

Cheers!!!

Ed




Post 12

Thursday, August 18, 2005 - 5:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Robert, yes, as thick as two *very* short planks :-)

It irks me the way so many say: oh, sure, the Marxists were wrong but there was genius in their error. Bullshit!

I always repair to Mises on this: socialism is nothing more than a grand rationalisation of petty resentments. Lay it on 'em, Ludwig!

Petty, nasty, evil, thick, dumb.

Ross



Post to this thread
[an error occurred while processing this directive]


User ID Password or create a free account.