About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, July 27, 2006 - 7:01amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Steven, I appreciated this article and sanctioned it.  I also respect your benevolence in your consistent efforts at blood donation.

I have read that blood banks do not pay for blood donations because it encourages donations from, well, "lower quality" people, e.g. street bums, etc. who have a higher risk for disease.  Given the screening of blood that happens already, I find this attitude a bit puzzling.  Perhaps you can comment.

Like you, I find the advertisement you criticize morally revolting.




Post 1

Thursday, July 27, 2006 - 8:27amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit

Blood banks already have a hard time getting the right donors anyway. Last November, I was disqualified because I apparently did not have enough iron in my blood.

Years ago, I received a letter saying that they would not accept my blood because of some protein level in my blood. I showed that letter to my doctor, and he told me not to worry about it.

And many times on hot days, donors will be disqualified simply because their temperatures are too high.

Keep in mind that the main organization in charge of blood donation is a giant, bloated bureaucracy--the Red Cross. First, they engage in the extremely questionable task of collecting the Social Security numbers of donors. I know a few people who refuse to donate just because of this.

And if you tried to do any volunteering after Katrina last year, you learned just how incompetent they are. I know many who were turned away. It happened to me twice.

It's really a shame because donating blood is so important. I'm O+ which is quite common. But that also means that there are more people who need it.




Post 2

Thursday, July 27, 2006 - 8:46amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
I was denied because I had been to a high risk third world country (The Domincan Republic) within the past year (interestingly enough, they didn't mind that I had recently received a tattoo).



Post 3

Thursday, July 27, 2006 - 8:59amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Sanctioned!

I saw that ad a few days ago and thought it was horrible! 




Post 4

Thursday, July 27, 2006 - 1:11pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
In the office building that I work at, there is an add for a blood drive with a little girl on it. It says, "Every summer, blood reserves run low... Try telling that to a little girl with leukemia."

I, personally, would not have trouble saying such a thing, simply because it is true. I don't like the idea of being guilted into donating blood. "Guilt is a rope that wears thin."



Post 5

Friday, February 8 - 12:11pmSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
Steven, I appreciated this article and sanctioned it.  I also respect your benevolence in your consistent efforts at blood donation.

Ditto what Luke said above.  Good letter!




Post 6

Monday, February 11 - 9:35amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
What is the reason that blood cannot be bought and sold like any other commodity?  Doesn't blood get purchased by hospitals?



Post 7

Monday, February 11 - 11:30amSanction this postReply
Link
Edit
What is the reason that blood cannot be bought and sold like any other commodity?  Doesn't blood get purchased by hospitals?
 
A lot of the laws prohibiting that are due to statist politicians who can't stand the notion of people turning a profit from a charitable enterprise, because they think donors should be forced to behave altruistically when people are suffering.  It's the same mindset that is driving the political push toward socialized medicine -- the attitude of "How dare doctors and nurses turn a buck off of suffering?  They should be altruistically treating people out of the goodness of their hearts!"




Post to this thread
User ID Password reminder or create a free account.