| | When Obama and the Obamoids are selling "we are all in this together", they for sure are not talking about 'under rules of free association.'
Implicit in this sell job is that 'we are all forcefully in this together.
We will never hear them admit this, but it is the essence of their legislative agenda; forced association: "We are all in this together by decree."
It is the difference between socialism and national socialism. Clearly, the nation is divided on the agenda of socialism. Shoving it down the entire nation's throat,49% to 51%, is exactly what is dividing the nation against itself and creating a circular firing squad of raised middle fingers aimed at each other.
Entire generations of ... it pains to use the word 'Americans' now find it not only acceptable but desirable to advocate for national socialism.
Is it unfortunate for them to have to refer to national socialism as national socialism? Is that just too unfair, to point out the totalitarian nature of national socialism, when someone advocates for national socialism? I'd hope the comparison would not need to be made too often; it should be a no f'n brainer.
Why do socialists inevitably wax totalitarian? Because they must. Because their lie won't fly as long as the victims of socialism are actually free to flee. And so, the barely veiled advocacy -- embrace -- of forced association. Anywhere else in the annals of human interaction where we find forced association we find rape and slavery as well; you'd think this would be a clue.
And these folks are actually -proud- of such an agenda that requires of them that kind of blood lust.
The greatest irony? They award themselves a moral sanction ... to be rapists and slave owners. Now, cut to Obama, shucking and jiving, sliding in for the easy layup, the pat on the back, the hand on the upper arm...there-there now, no need to use nasty words..he's a less muscular muslim socialist, yuk yuk,yuk.... Heck, we are supposed to think, if anyone understands the issue of slavery it is for sure this Man of Color.
Sure; this product of Affirmative Action on steroids, along with his wife, 'angry' after seeing '42' because that was for sure their experience when they were Golden Passed into the Ivies. (Who in America was buying her righteous indignation? She needs to sell it to Oprah.who can afford to buy some or all of it, I'm sure.) Please; there are no Americans farther removed from the issues of slavery than these Ivy League Obamas-- or Oprah for that matter, which makes them the perfect carriers to advocate for forced association.
|
|
