About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, September 25, 2013 - 7:53pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Joe,
Instead of saying "I have a right to free speech", you could easily put it in another form by saying "My speech should be free". Or you could say something like "My speech is rightful", which puts it in another form as well.
This is intriguing. I remember when we debated about the harmony of interests being the logical/empirical foundation of anything that deserves to be called "rights." I liked that debate because it expanded my mind. I'm thinking in even more general terms now: "The speech of mankind should be free.", "Human speech is rightful."

If claiming to be in personal possession of rights is problematic (as in your essay), then what about the issue of claiming personal use? Is it good enough to remain in the particular (as in your quote above)? Is there any clarity to be gained from generalizing away from the particular? Questions to ponder ...

Ed


Post 1

Monday, November 4, 2013 - 10:10pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ed, the problem that I see is with the claim of ownership of your rights. It relies on the concept of ownership, even though ownership is a kind of right.

My problem isn't with the personal part of the personal possession. So I see no issue with generalizing to something like "the speech of mankind should be free".

Post 2

Tuesday, November 5, 2013 - 5:50pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks, Joe.

Ed


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.