About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 3, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 2:34pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The manifesto below was posted by Joseph Andrew Stack on his website embeddedart.com prior to his suicide by flying his plane into an IRS building in Austin, Texas. I post it not out of agreement, but out of dismay that it was removed from the internet at the insistence of the FBI.

from http://www.webcitation.org/5ndnnvvrP

If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer... and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.

Note:

· "another person" is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

· "taxpayer" is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

· "individual", "employee", or "worker" is you.



Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.



The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.



Joe Stack (1956-2010)

02/18/2010





Post 1

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 3:54pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thank you!

Ever heard of old Chinese curse: wishing you to live in interesting times?

We live in interesting times indeed.

Post 2

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 4:02pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ted,

There's a reason law enforcement officials forbid pedestrians from entering crime scenes, or from handling evidence.  The FBI have to assess whether or not this nut was working alone, or if there are any coded messages in his ramblings, etc.  The post is "evidence." 

No conspiracy involved, just responsible law enforcement.


Post 3

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 4:19pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The FBI is free to make the coded message argument to a judge. But this is a US citizen on US soil.

The forum at the web hosting company has posts from their management saying that Stack's account ran out of bandwidth within 5 minutes of the story breaking. But they also said the FBI did not provide any court order or even a request in writing to remove the manifesto.

Post 4

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 4:26pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
After reading this thing, it's obvious this guy wasn't a full blown nut.  How miserably sad. 

Post 5

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 4:37pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The FBI is free to make the coded message argument to a judge. But this is a US citizen on US soil.

Yeah, well, he's also a suspect in a probable murder. My sympathy is with law enforcement on this one.

No court order is ever given to do the initial investigation of a murder. Ever. Law enforcement doesn't need a court order to arrest drunk drivers, wife beaters, or murderers. They just gather evidence and make arrests based on their experience, training, and judgement.

Relax, they'll be an official release of this document sooner or later.



Post 6

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 6:29pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
First you say there is no "conspiracy" now you tell me to "relax"? Drop the condescension. Who said anything about a conspiracy? My complaint is not about the speed of the FBI, but its action without legal authority. If you want the FBI to have the power to shut down websites belonging to American citizens convicted of no crime, then I suggest you relax, formulate a constitutional means of having the FBI or whomever show probable cause, and take it from there.

An after the fact message on a website will not, of itself, kill anybody, Any secret message would be to people who would already have read the message by the time Stack acted. There was, for example, no incitement to any specific act here which would justify removing the manifesto. The FBI is governed by objective law, not personal discretion. Judges are available to issue warrants 24 hours a day. The fact that the internet is new and scary is no grounds to allow the FBI to violate the First and Fourth Amendments.

(Edited by Ted Keer on 2/18, 6:38pm)


Post 7

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 6:37pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The Feds are pretty fast, aren't they?  Not fast enough to outrun Smoking Gun, though.

I don't understand why this is such a problem for you.  It's their job, Ted.  Why are you so suspicious of this action?


Post 8

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 7:16pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

There is no "suspicion" of anything on my part.* What possible grounds have I given for you to think so? Are the only people you know who care about the Constitution conspiracy theorists? (Perhaps the fact that this Stack guy sounds like Phil Osborn has you confused?) I think the feds acted in good faith and I do not believe any actual harm was done other than to precedent. But principle is principle and objective law is objective law and the road to hell is paved with good intentions. We don't need to grant to the FBI the same arbitrary powers sought by the rulers of Iran and China, even if we happen to trust the FBI. The simple fact is that the action was in violation of the Constitution. I think the FBI should be held to a standard embodied in its oath of office:

I will support and defend the Constitution of the
United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to
the same; that I take this obligation freely, without
any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that
I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the
office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

----

I am taking as given the version of events presented by Alex Melen from Stack's web hosting company on the forum they set up to discuss the manifesto and its removal.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 9

Thursday, February 18, 2010 - 7:48pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
1. Probable cause and a court order authorizing taking something as evidence - these are key protections of our liberty.

2. You don't put up a message in place of some web pages, because there are no web pages in the paper sense - they are digital representations. You make copies of the files on the hard disk, or you take the entire server. In either case, the company can put up a new server with a copy of the old system's hard drive.

3. This looks like censorship on the part of the FBI - that would be strange and I can't imagine it being the actual reason.

I'm on the side of law enforcement but never when they act without observing property rights. To enforce the law, they must obey the law.

Post 10

Saturday, February 20, 2010 - 5:11amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I'd agree that the FBI had no business censoring the message, regardless of its content. Had Stack not committed the wrongful act he did, few would have noticed his remarks and probably fewer would have agreed. The censoring of his remarks has nothing to do with good police work. It is more of a knee-jerk politically-sensitive reaction inappropriate in a freee society.

jt

Post 11

Saturday, February 20, 2010 - 6:54pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Frustrated Owner Bulldozes Home Ahead Of Foreclosure

Man Says Actions Intended To Send Message To Banks

MOSCOW, Ohio --

Like many people, Terry Hoskins has had troubles with his bank. But his solution to foreclosure might be unique.

Hoskins said he's been in a struggle with RiverHills Bank over his Clermont County home for nearly a decade, a struggle that was coming to an end as the bank began foreclosure proceedings on his $350,000 home.

"When I see I owe $160,000 on a home valued at $350,000, and someone decides they want to take it – no, I wasn't going to stand for that, so I took it down," Hoskins said.

Hoskins said the Internal Revenue Service placed liens on his carpet store and commercial property on state Route 125 after his brother, a one-time business partner, sued him.

The bank claimed his home as collateral, Hoskins said, and went after both his residential and commercial properties.

"The average homeowner that can't afford an attorney or can fight as long as we have, they don't stand a chance," he said.

Hoskins said he'd gotten a $170,000 offer from someone to pay off the house, but the bank refused, saying they could get more from selling it in foreclosure.

Hoskins told News 5's Courtis Fuller that he issued the bank an ultimatum.
"I'll tear it down before I let you take it," Hoskins told them.

And that's exactly what Hoskins did.

The Moscow man used a bulldozer two weeks ago to level the home he'd built, and the sprawling country home is now rubble, buried under a coating of snow.

"As far as what the bank is going to get, I plan on giving them back what was on this hill exactly (as) it was," Hoskins said. "I brought it out of the ground and I plan on putting it back in the ground."

Your Comments

The IRS will not change it's collection procedures as a result of acts of violence. Even bringing down a building with a small plane will have no impact on politicians to change the Code. The only way is through activism thorugh a political party (generally fruitlless) or follow the baby boomer approach which was massive street protests and boycotts...all non-violent. This is the only way that change is possible, other than organized voting. It may feel good to see someone destroy themselves or others but the IRS doesen't even blink an eye when that happens. Anthony Muraski

Feb. 20, 2010 9:14pm EST | from ANTHONYMURASKI

And, btw, i don't have insurance on the place. No tricks on my part....

Feb. 20, 2010 8:28pm EST | from Johnny56

Who is John Galt

Feb. 20, 2010 8:23pm EST | from WhoisJohnGalt

awesome,i love it

Feb. 20, 2010 8:15pm EST | from cincy221980

Post 12

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 7:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Speaking of Phil Osborn...

See, even Ted isn't a troll all the time.  So there, Phil!  (No need to answer...) 

I was thinking that in a fictional world in which the U.S. had another revolution, one of the things that might lead up to it would be if rewards were posted for revolutionary acts. 

Imagine:  There are people who are dying of cancer and could use the cash for themselves or for their loved ones.  Instead of ending up in severe unending pain for weeks, months or years, knowing that the only relief will come when they can't keep you alive anymore, and that meanwhile all the wealth that you created in your life has gone to pay for the torture, leaving nothing for your kids, wife, etc., why not do something important that you can be proud of while you still can?   Hey, it works for the Taliban. 


Post 13

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 8:14pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Poleznye Idioty

The American Revolution did not follow that model. In the American Revolution there were already legitimate minarchies in place. What was necessary and was accomplished was simply for an already self-governing and self sufficient set of entities to divorce themselves from an abusive absentee parasite.

The random acts of domestic violence route has been tried. The model is the anarchists of pre-revolutionary Russia. There was no functioning state in place looking to be liberated from external domination. The anarchists had only one thing in common, not a philosophy of reason and human rights, but an infatuation with violence. And like your errant hero, those anarchists were amateurs. Useful idiots.

Post 14

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 8:28pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"See, even Ted isn't a troll all the time."   Oops.

Did I advocate anything?  Did I say that this guy is my hero?   And, BTW, just why is it that you want sex with children legalized?

Actually, the accounts that I've read of the anarchists in Russia during the revolution indicate that they were more on the lines of great organizers and inspirers than assassins.  Of course, they were far, far from being anarcho-capitalists or even individualist anarchists.  They were generally about as collectivist as the Bosheviks, sad to say.  The difference was that they believed in a voluntary, decentralized collectivism.  They had enough popular support that Mahknow, the most famous of the Ukrainian anarchists, defeated the most powerful white army with volunteers, instead of the conscripts that the Bolsheviks dragooned to fight for them.

Occasionally assassination is a good idea, of course.  Apparently, as many as several hundred Italian anarchists lost their lives in a multitude of attempts to assassinate Mussolini.  How much better it might have been without El Duce or Hitler.  And a good lesson for anyone desirous of taking their place.


Post 15

Thursday, March 11, 2010 - 9:07amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Phil, what did you mean by "why not do something important that you can be proud of while you still can?"

You seem to want to both praise and yet not praise these anarchists at the same time yet still get credit for saying something profound, as if self-contradiction were the essence pf profundity.

But whatever it is that you want to deny that you are saying, it really doesn't matter to my point, which is that random bomb throwers are not patriotic founding fathers.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.