| | Hi Rachel,
Regarding your question "The rule of law is a worthy goal to be pratice by any pracmatic gov't. how would you discuss this issue.", I refer you to the “This war on terrorism is bogus” thread and posts, where I address those issues:
Saturday, October 11, 2003 - 12:05 am Contrary to … post: The Shredding of Our Highest Laws is Immoral NO matter if it was done by The Founding Fathers themselves…
Sunday, October 12, 2003 - 12:59 pm We are supposed to be a Constitutionally Limited Republic (The Rule of Objective Law), not a Democracy (The Rule of Men). As such, our government's purpose is to stringently, intransigently, uncompromisingly, and intolerantly, ENFORCE the Bill of Rights--the first 10 Amendments to the US Constitution--and defend individuals from the Rule of Men and foreign invaders…
Monday, October 13, 2003 - 06:19 pm I would like to thank No 6, David and Dennis Wilson for their incisive and informative posts…The regulations and controls in such a society are not laws on the activities of peaceful citizens but on the two classes of citizens who initiate force: common criminals and government officials…
|
|