I was reading through that paper, and I realized that the angle of the paper takes an ambiguous approach to cause and effect. Does homosexual behaviour lead to promiscuity, or does promiscuity lead to homosexual behaviour?
The argument seems to lean toward homosexual behaviour leading to promiscuity, but Catholics argue that no person is born gay. If this is true (that no person is born gay), then what is being said is that men, who can’t get enough heterosexual sex, participate in homosexual behaviour because they (as people) cannot satisfy their heterosexual desires for sex, by implication.
This suggests that promiscuity leads to homosexual behaviour, and not the other way round, as they would have us believe.
Which is it?!
Of course, both are false.
Just how does homosexuality lead to promiscuity? Well, according to the paper, and a cited author, homosexuality leads to promiscuity by indoctrination, not natural tendencies (as the paper would like us to believe), leaving the homosexual incapable of wanting to experience romantic love and be part of a committed, monogamous relationship via brainwashing. But this is also not true, as many homosexuals want just that—a monogamous relationship. And many parcitipate in such relatioships.
The below quote, from the paper, suggests indoctrination, and thus contradicts its own (the paper's) position that it’s the natural behaviour of a homosexual which leads promiscuity:
Gay author Gabriel Rotello notes the perspective of many gays that “gay liberation was founded…on a ‘sexual brotherhood of promiscuity,’ and any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to ‘communal betrayal of gargantuan proportions’”
It is promiscuity that leads to increasing one’s chances of acquiring disease, damaging one’s mental health, shortening one’s life-span, and distorting the definition of monogamy, NOT homosexuality.