| | Truthfan: “In a two party system Democrats will have to combat the GOP, using truth.”
If the Dems use the truth, they will lose all the time. What are they going to say, “we’re going to ratify Kyoto and collapse the economy”, “we’re going to implement universal healthcare and tax you all to death”, “we’re going to disarm every one in this country except the criminals”? Look what slips out when they do tell the truth:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39205
Hillary Clinton, San Francisco fundraiser, June 2004
“Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.”We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/000369.html
As for the Bush’s supposed lying, How? When? He said Iraq had WMD’s, we didn’t find any. Does that mean he lied? No, you don’t know that and you can’t. They could have gotten bad intel, it happens. He could have snuck them off to Syria, the point is, you don’t know. I for one don’t care; I was for the war because Saddam supported terrorists who wanted to kill Americans, period. Look at the Bush doctrine, look at that and tell me invading Iraq doesn’t fit under that plan.
“the United States would engage - militarily, and preemptively if necessary - rogue nations that support terrorists and develop weapons of mass destruction”
Even if I knew Saddam didn’t have WMD’s, the war would have still been right. I don’t understand how you can look a kid in the face and take the chance of not going war to protect ourselves.
Besides:
Howard Dean - September 2002, "There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat to the United States and to our allies."
Wesley Clark - Sept. 26, 2002, “When we took action in Kosovo, we did not have United Nations approval. . . . There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat. . . . Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. . . . He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities”
John Rockefeller - Oct. 10, 2002, "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years”
John Kerry – “We know we can't count on the French. We know we can't count on the Russians. We know that Iraq is a danger to the United States, and we reserve the right to take pre-emptive action whenever we feel it's in our national interest."
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.”
So Bush was the only one lying?
|
|
