| | Barbara,
In reality there is no "evidence" for "anomalous perception." I've been following the literature, and there is overwhelming evidence in the opposite direction: for a law of nature that information cannot exist, or be communicated, except as attributes of energy or matter.
I recall discussing Nathaniel's intellectual history with you at SOLOC 4, and you told me that he had no interest in the mathematical foundations of measurement. But without those foundations one cannot evaluate statistical evidence, which is the only possible evidence for so-called "anomalous perception" (in the accepted sense of perception lacking a material medium.) And with proper measurements, the so-called "evidence" for such things always disappears. Has Nathaniel Branden expanded his interests to include the foundations of measurement, and come up with a major breakthrough? If not, where do his claims of "evidence" come from?
|
|
