[an error occurred while processing this directive]
About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 6:09pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
After debating on the Is circumcising an infant an initiation of force? thread, I decided to do a little research myself on Circumcision and Foreskin Restoration!

Information about the function of the foreskin:
Circumcision Information and Resource Pages.

Comparison of intact vs circumcised:
Intactivism Pages

Foreskin reversal information:
CIRP
CIRP
Circumcision information resource centre

Groups:
National Organization of Restoring Men

Diary:
Paul Russo (pictures)

So it looks like men can restore some functionality of the foreskin. You'll never get back the highly sensitive nerve filled frenulum or the normally inner foreskin... but you can:
1. Restore the glans (the head of your penis) to its normal state, which lacks the protective thick keratinized skin layer.
2. Restore your skin to its original more mobile functionality, which numerous benefits during sexual intercourse like less damaging friction during intercourse and keeping lubrication inside of the vagina.

I'm going to try to restore my foreskin. Feel free to ask me in 3-12 months how its going, whether I am still doing it, and if I've noticed any differences.



Post 1

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 7:57pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dean,

Good for you. For study control, you have to sleep with Ashley before and after so that we can get her feedback on the effect restoration has on your apparent level of enjoyment.

I gave some thought to a different procedure, but decided against. This quack was saying he could restore me by removing a third of my length. He said the skin I had would behave as uncut after that. I was like, “I’m not sure that’s worth a whole inch!”

Jon



Post 2

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 8:06pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Jon, that is what I call "a solution worse than the problem"!



Post 3

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 8:13pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Dean, that non-surgical approach looks interesting.  Do alert us in a few months to let us know if it really works and whether the results warrant the effort.

Thanks for researching this and posting the informative links!

I am glad we had this discussion thread.  I had wondered for a long time if male circumcision had any merit.  The preponderance of evidence clearly says no.

(Edited by Luke Setzer on 11/25, 8:14pm)




Post 4

Friday, November 25, 2005 - 11:56pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Heheheh, all the embarassment I suffered as an uncut male in the junior high locker room seems suddenly worth it ....



Post 5

Sunday, March 19, 2006 - 9:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This quack was saying he could restore me by removing a third of my length. He said the skin I had would behave as uncut...

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Whoa!

(Edited by Get to living! Donna Reed on 3/19, 9:47pm)




Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 4, No Sanction: 0
Post 6

Monday, March 20, 2006 - 8:35amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Donna,

You ‘cut’ the joke from my quote!

You have to include: “I’m not sure that’s worth a whole inch!””

Get it? The implication is that I have a three-inch penis.

My brother and I once approached our dad’s father: “We’re not happy with our size, and blame you.” He said, “Boys. If anyone ever teases you about it, remind them that we Letendres may have small penises, but we also have pile-driving hips.”




Post 7

Monday, March 20, 2006 - 8:45amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
*falling off of my chair laffing*

That was funny.  I missed it.  It was very late and I'd been reading for a while.

I saw "remove a third of my length" and almost choked on my tea.




Post 8

Monday, March 20, 2006 - 1:09pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
>For study control, you have to sleep with Ashley before and after so that we can get her feedback on the effect restoration has on your apparent level of enjoyment.

Ha!

Looks like my sly ulterior motive has been revealed.



Post 9

Monday, March 20, 2006 - 6:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ashley: "Looks like my sly ulterior motive has been revealed."

"Sly" to whom?


Michael




Post to this thread
[an error occurred while processing this directive]


User ID Password or create a free account.