About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Thursday, May 31, 2012 - 5:45amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
North Carolina's legislature tries to outlaw some calculations, because their results would demonstrate a rise in sea level.

Post 1

Friday, June 1, 2012 - 4:36pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Kate,

It'd be interesting to get N. Carolina's reasoning. We get the official science reasoning (geometric rise in sea level), but not N. Carolina's reasoning (linear rise in sea level). Besides positive feedback, there is also negative feedback. I wonder if N. Carolina was thinking about that.

Ed


Post 2

Monday, June 4, 2012 - 4:38amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Some of the comments to that article suggested that real estate lobbyists campaigned to pass that legislation. That strikes me as the most likely explanation. This goes back to crony capitalism combined with a mixed economy that externalizes risk onto the backs of taxpayers. If people want to build or buy on land that will be underwater according to the most widely accepted scientific models, they should take that risk themselves and pay the insurances premiums accordingly -- if they can get insurance at all. Outlawing the models will not alter the outcomes of nature though they will affect the economic impacts adversely for some at the benefit of others.

Post 3

Monday, June 4, 2012 - 5:20amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Before we go any further with this, could someone tell me where the state outlawed calculations? I read the linked-to bill, and, as I understood it (not being a lawyer or legislator), it defined jurisdiction over the sea-level question. What did I miss?

Post 4

Saturday, June 9, 2012 - 1:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
North Carolina House Bill 819 states that (interspersed numbers are the line numbers of the bill):
[10] (e) The Division of Coastal Management shall be the only State agency authorized to develop rates of sea-level rise and shall do so only at the request of the Commission. These [11] rates shall only be determined using historical data, and these data shall be limited to the time [12] period following the year 1900. Rates of sea-level rise may be extrapolated linearly to estimate [13] future rates of rise but shall not include scenarios of accelerated rates of sea-level rise. Rates of [14] sea-level rise shall not be one rate for the entire coast but, rather, the Division shall consider [15] separately oceanfront and estuarine shorelines.
http://www.nccoast.org/uploads/documents/CRO/2012-5/SLR-bill.pdf

Recap:
There are many State agencies, but the only one authorized to develop rates of sea-level rise is the Division of Coastal Management -- and it is only authorized to develop those rates in accordance with a stated methodology.

That still leaves my question (regarding positive and negative environmental feedbacks) unanswered.

Ed


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.