Rebirth of Reason

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Wednesday, December 4, 2013 - 9:16pmSanction this postReply
In today's news we learn that in the last three and one half years President Obama has met with the Secretary of Health and Human Services ZERO times. Zero.

In that time (March 23, 2010 signing to November 30, 2013) he met with other Cabinet members 277 times. We know that this is his signature piece of legislation. We know from his own lips that he will not allow any changes (other than those he makes by edict) and will veto any attempts to change it or repeal it. We know that he has uttered more rhetoric on behalf of this policy than any other (and that's a lot of words). Obamacare is thousands of pages of law, tens of thousands of pages of regulations, and the transformation of 1/6th of the national economy. (Even Joe Biden recognizes that this is "a big fucking deal.")

So why would Obama not have a single meeting with his direct report - Kathleen Sebelius? She reports directly to the President - she has no one else above her. (And many other critical issues fall under this department.) Why would the person in charge his single biggest and most important project, his personal legacy, his namesake, NEVER be in the Oval office? I can only think of a few reasons.

1.) Maybe his cabinet secretary was just a figure head and he knows that she is of no substance at all and his meetings and contacts regarding his most important legislative baby were taken with others. But she was a two term Governor of Kansas - so she isn't just fluff. And she was a fierce advocate of government health care from way before her appointment.

2.) Sometime after he selected her, they had a intense falling out and he couldn't stand to be in the same room with her. I could see this being the case.

3.) Maybe all contact was purposely not with her because they knew the time would come when they had to throw someone under the bus. Maybe they had meetings more than three and a half years ago, back when they considered the risks involved in promising lower costs, better access, and "You can keep you health plan" and "You can keep your doctor."

Maybe someone says, "If we don't make those promises, it won't pass." And someone else replies, "Well then we will have to have someone ready to toss under the bus, because Barrack will look like a liar if this goes South." And the decision is made to establish deniability. He trusted her. She screwed up. He had no idea (sound familiar?).

Maybe I'm getting too cynical.... or paranoid?

Post 1

Thursday, December 5, 2013 - 5:54amSanction this postReply
Or, maybe he is the Ivy League Golden Passer that he appears to be. He gives speeches. He poses. He is charismatic. He is the world's most competent campaigner for power. He plays into the fantasies of every guilty white liberal with his well spoken young black man schtick.

And that is the sum and substance of both him and the team that he's put together to 'run the Economy,' and when it comes time for the rubber to actually hit the road, Team Obama's tank is empty of any actual real world experience.


(Edited by Fred Bartlett on 12/05, 5:57am)

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Thursday, December 5, 2013 - 6:24amSanction this postReply
Fred, he is all of that... no doubt. But he is also a progressive ideologue.

His last speech, which the conservatives think is an attempt to distract from ObamaCare negatives, and it may be an attempt to distract, but I also heard in that speech a call to his basic belief, his heart felt yearning for the great collective touch-stone: Income Equality (spelled out: We will take control of all things and use that power to take money away from the successful till they are sorry they were ever born, and give some of it to the unsuccessful who hold us hostage with their miserableness).

Post to this thread

User ID Password or create a free account.