About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Tuesday, July 31, 2007 - 6:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Well, DUH!!


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Tuesday, July 31, 2007 - 9:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Anyone catch the spoofs based on his Net Neutrality speech?  Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhH1GD1ULJM.  ("The internet is not a big truck.  The internet is a series of tubes!")  This guy's highly remixable!  ;-)

Post 2

Tuesday, July 31, 2007 - 9:23pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Net Neutrality is not a Big Joke

In its essence, "net neutrality" is an attempt by cable companies to prevent phone companies and the internet to compete with them in transmitting premium digital video. The cable companies are arguing that it is unfair for digital carriers to give priority to their own premium subscriber video transmissions in a way that will supposedly slow down other packet processing over their networks. It is as if bottled water companies wanted local water utilities not to pump drinking water to homes in the name of "fairness" to farm irrigation. The video is funny, but my understanding of Stevens is that the corrupt pork mongering bastard holds the correct free-market position on this issue.

Ted Keer

Post 3

Wednesday, August 1, 2007 - 11:25amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The solution to the problem of net neutrality is competition at the physical layer. We don't have very much of that. This is due largely to government interference already.

You have a right to a free press. That does not mean that anyone is obligated to sell you paper.


Post 4

Wednesday, August 1, 2007 - 11:44amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
So-called net neutrality is not an actual phenomenon, it is a buzzword created by those who wish to pass a "net neutrality" act. Your comment itself is correct, Chris. But I fear too many people don't realize that the term itself is a buzzword developed by lobbyists with "focus groups" at the behest of companies that want to hobble competition with regulation, and that anyone who says he's concerned about "net neutrality" is trying to smuggle in the conclusion without naming or arguing for the premises.

Ted Keer

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.