About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, May 7, 2010 - 9:06amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
My angel investing group mentioned this. They think 70% of angel investors will be dropped from "qualified investor" status (or whatever they call it). I'll be out.

I guess Chris Dodd agrees with Obama that we already have "enough money."

Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 6, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Friday, May 7, 2010 - 9:10amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
That thing is awful... It is like it was lifted from the pages of Atlas Shrugged.

The bill creates a new independent, consumer protection watchdog, housed at the Federal Reserve - independent is right, Congress can't even get the Fed to tell them where it is loaning money and they can't even pass a bill that forces the Fed to provide them with an audit report! But given that this bill was written by Dodd (of Countrywide, Fanny and Freddy fame) and that congress may be just pretending to be unable to rein in the Fed, for the sake of deniability, the independence might just be to keep it hidden from taxpayers in way that gives deniability to congress. Gee, I'm getting kind of suspicious in my old age :-)
------------------

- "Independent Rule Writing: Able to autonomously write rules for consumer protections governing all entities – banks and non-banks – offering consumer financial services or products."

Well, that's about it for free enterprise. And independent authority can make any rule it wants. Don't we call that tyranny?
------------------

- "Able to Act Fast: With this bureau on the lookout for bad deals and schemes, consumers won’t have to wait for Congress to pass a law to be protected from bad business practices."

Yeah, why bother with laws - those evil business people shouldn't get any advance warning of when they are doing something that will bring the wrath of the government down on them.

- "Educates: Creates a new Office of Financial Literacy."

Oh yeah... we've just been waiting for the government to explain financial things to us. They are so good at this financial stuff - like balancing the books, budgeting, efficient spending practices, and so forth.
-----------------

- "Works with Bank Regulators: Coordinates with other regulators when examining banks to prevent undue regulatory burden. Consults with regulators before a proposal is issued and regulators could appeal regulations if they believe would put the safety and soundness of the banking system or the stability of the financial system at risk."

If they consult too closely we end up with regulatory capture (the industry gets the government regulator in its pocket), but usually this is only partially the case - the regulations get a little fuzzy here and there and just a few special companies get an inside track and special deals and others get shafted. This bill stands as a clear example of arbitrary regulation, as opposed to objective law.
--------------

"...imposing tough new capital and leverage requirements that make it undesirable to get too big..."

Sounds real business friendly doesn't it?
----------------

- "Break Up Large, Complex Companies: Able to approve, with a 2/3 vote, a Federal Reserve decision to require a large, complex company, to divest some of its holdings if it poses a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States" and "Authorized to require, with a 2/3 vote, nonbank financial companies that would pose a risk to the financial stability of the US if they failed be regulated by the Federal Reserve."

These are from the Financial Stability Oversight Council - a new group that is run by Treasury Secretary (currently Tim Geitner - the fellow that cheated on his taxes).
-----------

I didn't have the stomach to do any more.

Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 11, No Sanction: 0
Post 2

Monday, May 10, 2010 - 5:16amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"Break Up Large, Complex Companies:"...

But not large, complex government bureaucracies?

What's worse? Monopolists, or monopolists with guns?

Which one has the greatest power to fat finger the economies(none the least of which is by insisting on referring to them as THE ECONOMY)and get it wrong on a massive single-point-of-failure, all-our-eggs-in-one-basket, one-size-fits-all manner?

Like they just got caught doing, and continue to do.

McCain missed lots of opportunities during the campaign. When Obama chastised him with his 'a scalpel is needed, not an axe,' McCain should have caught the mood of the country and responded with "Hell no, an axe is exactly what is needed."

regards,
Fred

Post 3

Monday, July 26, 2010 - 10:16amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Here is a WSJ op-ed about the financial reform bill not including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fan and Fred and the Problem of Narrative
The GSEs don't fit the left's story about how greedy bankers caused the financial crisis.

An online subscription is needed to read it online, but the it is in the print edition, too. One excerpt:
The real reason, I suspect, is that [lawmakers like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd] still don't have any idea what went wrong with Fan and Fred. They were supposed to be doing good. They were chartered by the government and did its bidding. That they failed so spectacularly, and have already cost so much money to prop up, is not something for which they have any adequate explanation.

No subscription is needed to read this one, though:
Geithner: U.S. Should Retain a Mortgage Backstop
 
Geithner is usually for subsidizing failure.

(Edited by Merlin Jetton on 7/26, 10:35am)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.