About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, October 1, 2011 - 6:07pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Bill,

I do like this essay.

I think he's stretching a little when he claims that natural law theorists are basically religionists in sheep's clothing, but I like the essay, overall. It's true that Locke wrote for (in) a religious society, and I think he pandered to the crowd and to the rich and powerful religionists. I think this is true of the Founding Fathers, too. They each, in their own way, made some kind of a reference to some kind of a Higher Power. But I honestly don't think you could get away with having an "Ayn Rand" in the 17th or even the 18th Century.

I think she would have been burned at the stake.

Over a long time period, it's like we had to get ready for her ideas (by growing up and shedding childish notions).

Ed


Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 18, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Saturday, October 1, 2011 - 7:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Remember how new science is.

Our country was 83 years old before Darwin's The Origin of Species was published. Putting Darwin's Natural Selection together with Genetics didn't come about till the 1930's. From 1779 till 1862, when America was 86 years old, the earth was thought to be about 75,000 years old. Radiometric dating didn't exist till early in 1900's. The theories of Continental Drift to Plate Tectonics spanned 1910 to 1970.

People at the time of our founding fathers didn't have electricity or telephones and traveled by horse and sailboat and didn't think in scientific terms as easily as we do now. Belief in some sort of deity must have been much easier to accept whether one was religious in practice or not.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.