About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2


Post 40

Monday, October 1, 2007 - 6:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
ADDENDUM:

     A 'value'-hierarchy, (can we say 'by definition' ?) necessarily requires 'integration.'

LLAP
J:D


Post 41

Tuesday, October 2, 2007 - 5:24amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
quote Bill: You need to give your ideas a lot more thought and, if nothing else, improve the precision with which you are trying to express them. If you do, I think you'll find that they lack evidential support. As you've stated them here, they are simply a loose, unintegrated collection of floating abstractions.
Thank you, you are absolutely right.

In other posts you say you are a "FORM" of existence - not an irreducible primary.
A form is created - arranged by some method whether it be integration, combination, whatever.

Definition - To experience: To be subjected to a stimulus

Irreducible primaries are singularities.
Forms, composites, etc. are pluralities comprised of multiple singularities.
When something happens to a primary - there is a singular reaction.
When something happens to a form or composite there is a plurality of reactions.
A singular existence has a single set of experiences.
A plurality has a plurality of experiences equivalent to the number of singularities in the set.
If you have a singular experience, you are a singular existence.
A plurality would experience a plurality of experiences.
Now if 'Integration' is a procedure which magically turns 6.42333 x10-^26 existences into a singular existence, please explain how this occurs.

Thank you.

(Edited by Jack (THoR) McNally on 10/02, 6:53am)


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1Page 2


User ID Password or create a free account.