About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Tuesday, August 13, 2002 - 1:07pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Okay, I'm officially losing my mind. I know I answered this question this morning! LOL!

Did I get it wrong? and so it was deleted?

As usual, I posted a slight tangent to the original question which was at what age did you UNDERSTAND what Rand wrote? LOL!

It sounds silly, but I first read Atlas Shrugged when I was around 20 but really didn't get it until I hit 30. I did take a few years off though ... by that I mean, I abandoned Rand's works because it seemed that I could not reconsile it with my life. Silly me! Of course I came back to it and it's been great ever since. My ex on the other hand also read it when he was 20 but I KNOW he's never understood a word Rand wrote though he'll argue otherwise.

Joy :)

Post 1

Wednesday, August 14, 2002 - 9:38amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I read ANTHEM first, at age 16. When I was 17 I read THE FOUNTAINHEAD, WE THE LIVING, and ATLAS SHRUGGED, in that order. At that time I was in Egypt, where Ayn Rand's novels were scarcely available (a classmate had his mother pick up a copy of ATLAS SHRUGGED in Lebanon, and it was passed around the school), and I fell madly in love with all of Ayn Rand's novels. The first thing I did when I returned to the States was buy a boxed set of her books. I don't think I understood them, then, nearly as much as I loved them.

Post 2

Thursday, August 15, 2002 - 2:31pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I see what Joy means about ages of reading as compared to age for undrestanding Rand's work. Although I did not know Rand the author until after age 30 I had seen The Fountainhead as a teenager. It remained my anthem to capitalism and individualism despite its unknown (to me) source.

It was many years later a neighbor brought me a copy of Atlas Shrugged. Her husband was angry with her as she had continued reading it over a Thanksgiving weekend. Among many other insights I learned the why of my unhappiness with conservatives and religious tolerance. I do believe it was the sanction of the victim.

Post 3

Monday, August 19, 2002 - 9:01amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I started reading Rand a year ago, and I started with Atlas Shrugged. I think that I started grokking Rand soon after I started reading her, but I'm not done yet.

Post 4

Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 1:24pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Age, that horrible thing that begins to happen at 30. This question seems to have an alterior purpose, to gage the chronological position of the readers and participators on this site. It is usually a question only asked by those who are over thirty:) Age is a fiction of the mind, an excuse for hypochondria, and a means of judging ripeness of character, that is usually proved entirely false upon close investigation. I began reading Rand at an age that was less than position I now occupy in the passage of time. I am perhaps too old to recall exactly, and too young to care. I certainly believe that a nonagenarian is too far advanced to benefit from Atlas Shrugged in any life altering way. As Rand said, the proper age to form a mind is very very young. I think she approved of the way the Jesuits swooped up the young before age seven. Unless of course we defy all institutions de facto, including age, which should be the first to go. I propose to abolish the institution of age and start living backwards. Hmm. I don't think that Rand should be read at any age before 20 (or so). She admitted to being a propagandist in a letter to Loeb (1944) and thus is guilty of at least one minor infraction. Minors who don't even know what propaganda is should be led by the hand and taught to distinguish properly between zeal and a proper balance of emotions. Now I am talking like a nonagenarian!! No really, I think Rand's non-fiction books should be read first as they allow one a deeper understanding of what the propaganda is for. Saying this, it might be that Rand was trying to start an aesthetic movement by constantly referring to her literature as evidence of her philosophy and her later assertion that it was propaganda. You will of course excuse my scattered thoughts and adament opinions. I find this question so central to the way in which people read Rand. I read the Romantic Manifesto somewhere between ages 18 and twenty, I think:) I loved it and mostly because it gave me a context by which to relate her thoughts to the aesthetic theories I was studying at university.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.