|But this is not democracy by the very root of itself. The democracy is first and all a voting process. So, the wolve and the sheep would vote on a topic, but it doesn't say that the wolves may eat the sheep. It just gives the oppinion that 92% of the population think they should eat the sheep, while 8% think they should eat grass or at least, not the sheep. However, the sheep will put in a vote on "who wants to eat meat but not the sheep, if the sheep shows an alternative!", suddenly we have 100% and the job goes on, that's consense politics.|
If now, they had eaten the sheep, it would have been democratur rather than democracy, because the latter does not include the execution of a poll, but only legitimates the polling.
If a democratic council votes with 60:40 voices that it is ok to genetically alter your genes, this doesn't force the 40 % to alter their genes. This is democracy as I understand it, because it is only the method to finding a decision, it doesn't enforce the decision.