About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 5:42amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I just finished "audibly reading" this book (see my blog entry) and this line made me laugh loudly. I absolutely agree with the gist of it. Sometimes you just have to stop a dead end conversation dead cold in its tracks.

Post 1

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 8:02amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
now, I understood why Peikoff said that, if the other party denies their existence, you have to stop the conversation, but why must you do so in this case? Would it be terribly difficult to say "OK, but God didn't do that, and if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle" and proceed to argue that the person has to live within the context of reality, regardless of whether its necessary or contingent?



Post 2

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 8:14amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time, for that's the stuff life is made of." --Benjamin Franklin, "Poor Richard's Almanack," June 1746

Post 3

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 8:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I haven't read ITOE in a while, but is that the context that she puts it in? That it's a waste of time? I always thought she said it was logically impossible to continue the argument.

Post 4

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 8:35amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Actually, it is both, with the logical impossibility of the argument making the continuation of the argument a waste of time.

Post 5

Friday, July 10, 2009 - 9:50amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
well, there I would quibble, because assuming that said arguer doesn't constantly default to "but it could be another way!", I think that he could accept that things are what they are.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.