| | now, I understood why Peikoff said that, if the other party denies their existence, you have to stop the conversation, but why must you do so in this case? Would it be terribly difficult to say "OK, but God didn't do that, and if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle" and proceed to argue that the person has to live within the context of reality, regardless of whether its necessary or contingent?
|
|