About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 16, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 9:21amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The notion of man as "God's partner" appears, one way or another, in most varieties of Judaism over the past 2000+ years (beginning in post-Biblical ethical/legal/other sources, e.g., the Talmud).

Quite a few Jewish sermons, for instance, have used the following story to illustrate the notion, as an example of the attitude we ought to have towards the Universe and what we can/should do therein:

A man working in his garden greets a passing stranger (in many versions, a minister or other Christian) who admires the property and says: "Isn't it great that God gives the world such beautiful places as this?" ... to this, the property-owner replies: "You wouldn't say that if you'd seen the place five years ago, when God had it all to himself."

( I presume that Obama's speechwriters do a bit of reading to find what phrases will impress this or that audience: "God's partners" tends to move an audience of rabbis -- or other informed Jews -- much more than it would move an audience of, say, Baptist ministers.)





Post 1

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 7:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
It's not the Jew-friendly message but the hypocrisy which rankles.

Post 2

Thursday, August 27, 2009 - 10:00amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
NR ran a good piece on Obama's Jewish outreach.  It included, among numerous valuable items, an excerpt from the Rosh Hashanah prayer:

On Rosh Hashanah will be inscribed ... how many will pass from the earth and how many will be created; who will live and who will die; who will die at his predestined time and who before his time; who by water and who by fire, who by sword, who by beast, who by famine, who by thirst, who by storm, who by plague, who by strangulation, and who by stoning...
 
This has to be the worst possible choice of words for him at this time.  Maybe this is why nobody calls him "scary smart" any more.
 
(Any lawyers out there?  Wouldn't a church be risking its tax-exempt status if it went along with Obama's request to push legislation from the pulpit?)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.