| | I was hoping for more input on the thread, because I thought it deserved more attention.
Stayed up until 3am reading and thinking about why this was bothering me, when it dawned on me that Curtis was inadvertently advocating a very similar, but extremely unpopular postion held by MSK a few years ago.
Kelly also tried to make a case for positive rights like this, but he had neither the technical grasp, or powers of articulation Curtis is using. I still think it's wrong, but the angle more interesting.
Ted's economic argument in this issue is much more compelling, and maybe that should be the focus instead of Curtis's take. I don't know.
Anyway, "feelings" had nothing to do with it. Feelings are the feeler's responsibility, not mine. I'm not going to be manipulated into walking on eggshells for the sake of feelings here.
|
|