About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 8:03amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This has been one of my favorite quotes and it doesn't take much to apply it to everyday politics and philosophy. Those who get bogged down in the minutiae and ignore the overarching principles are the bane of our society.

Sam


Post 1

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 1:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The usual way of taking this remark is that some people are good at one kind of thinking and some at the other, and the division of labor has a place for both.  I don't think Berlin meant it as a putdown.

Post 2

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 3:07pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
That's an interesting take on it that I hadn't considered but it doesn't fit as easily into my framework.

Post 3

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 8:22pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
The synthesis is in the fact that although general theories can yield general solutions, in the real world, narrowing the solution set to a workable size generally requires a multi-disciplinary approach.  Whether to build a dam in a particular location requires not just the physics of dams, or the engineering alternatives, but also the economic analysis, and the ecological impact on surrounding and downstream communities.  That's just the start.

In algebra we learn that isolating a unique solution requires at least as many independent equations as there are independent variables.  This is a good model of real-world problem solving.

Ethics, economics, psychology, aesthetics, mathematics and physics are all valid viewpoints on reality.  There are hidden dependencies among them all to be sure, but it is possible to bring them itteratively to the analysis of real-world problems, reducing solution spaces to manageable sizes.


Post 4

Wednesday, January 20, 2010 - 8:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

Spurned at the altar, Archilochus is famous for supposedly insulting his betrothed, her sisters, and their father so badly in verse at a festival that they hanged themselves.

He also dropped his shield in a battle and fled, and wrote a famous verse about his cowardice.* (But the saying "[come home] either with [your shield] or on it" is, of course, better known.)

It was said by his flatterers that his fame would live as long as Homer's. All but the barest fragments of his work is lost.

In Berlin's essay about the fox and the hedgehog, Plato is the supreme example of a hedgehog who knew one big thing. Aristotle, of course, is a fox.

There are two other beast even more widely known than the hedgehog for how they too respond to adversity: the opposum and the ostrich.





* A line from the poem runs: "But I got away, so what does it matter?" (I can see why Luke likes this guy.)


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 5

Thursday, January 21, 2010 - 5:14amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
As I bravely show my real face and phone number on my profile, thus demonstrating nothing to hide, I observe my own forthrightness and honesty and my embracement of my own life as my own ultimate value as I share this useful knowledge on RoR:

Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap ... and Others Don't by Jim Collins

"At the heart of the findings about these companies' stellar successes is what Collins calls the Hedgehog Concept, a product or service that leads a company to outshine all worldwide competitors, that drives a company's economic engine and that a company is passionate about."

It was through this book that I first learned the quote cited earlier which in turn led to further research on the quote for posting here.

(Edited by Luke Setzer on 1/21, 5:31am)


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.