About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 0

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 12:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
This is already being discussed at Reason Magazine, Pajamas Media, Gateway Pundit, and Little Green Footballs.


Post 1

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 2:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
There are certainly a lot of cult-like growths following in the wake of the Obama campaign. Like the law enforcement people in Mississippi targeting people saying bad things about Obama.

Post 2

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 2:55pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Does anyone else fear civil war may be looming?

Post 3

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 3:05pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Wow.

Scott, the comments in the links you posted are just priceless!

(Edited by Teresa Summerlee Isanhart on 9/30, 3:17pm)


Post 4

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 3:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Steve Wolfer: There are certainly a lot of cult-like growths following in the wake of the Obama campaign. Like the law enforcement people in Mississippi targeting people saying bad things about Obama.

Oh, sure. Just because a guy has groups of children singing to him as dear leader, has truth squads working on his behalf, has redesigned the flag (watch the video again), has redesigned the presidential seal, has his own gold coins minted with his image on them, wants to start a civilian security force, threatens TV stations that run ads critical of them with license revocation and Justice Dept. investigations, has his supporters flood radio stations to disrupt interviews of his critics, and threatens a Jewish group's tax-exempt status for inviting Sarah Palin to speak, you think he's some sort of messianic cult figure!


Teresa Summerlee Isanhart: Scott, the comments in the links you posted are just priceless!

I like them, too, My favorites is over at Reason: "Children of the ACORN?"

Post 5

Tuesday, September 30, 2008 - 5:15pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
It is time we get serious and recruit a cheer-leading team for Obama... maybe the Acornettes? That might be a little better than the Obama-Mammas.

Post 6

Wednesday, October 1, 2008 - 7:19pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Rodney:

Does anyone else fear civil war may be looming?

Yes


Post 7

Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 8:16amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Anyone who votes for a third party is stupid.

Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 8

Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 9:36amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Rodney, we have a difference of opinion. You said that anyone who votes for a third party is stupid. I am voting for a third party. I don't think of myself as stupid. I actually have some excellent reasons for my vote.

I am voting for a third party because the practice of voting for lesser of two evils lets the parties continue to be evil and put up crappy candidates. They are not going to change that practice just by being asked. They have to feel threatened by a third party before they move to become more like that party.

The Libertarian candidates are on every state's ballot and all that is needed is for people to make that choice. The alternative is to continue the trend that got us here and will just get worse. If you want a candidate that matches your principles, but don't vote for them when they are on the ballot you are not likely to get where you want to go - certainly nothing you are doing is likely to nudge the system in that direction, even microscopically.

It is leverage. Even a small number of votes for a third party scares the major parties and causes them to make changes. Where as voting for tweddle-dee or tweeddle-dum is throwing your vote away - it will make no change in the direction the system is heading and that is the more important issue.

Post 9

Thursday, October 2, 2008 - 11:59pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

If civil war were looming, it would be a good thing. It might mean that the right was willing to fight for its principles. It is not. Algor came within one Supreme Court vote of stealing the 2000 Election. In any other country there would have been riots. You guys are optimists.

Post 10

Monday, October 20, 2008 - 2:16pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
If McCain wins, civil war will not come, just riots. My fear is an Obama win, at which point all kinds of it will hit the fan.

Post 11

Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 5:20amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
My fear is an Obama win, at which point all kinds of it will hit the fan. (Rodney, bold mine)
Apparently, even Obama's running mate, Joe Biden, agrees with this:


“Mark my words,” Mr. Biden warned at the Seattle fund-raiser, according to reports from network producers traveling with him, “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember, I said it standing here, if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”
 
He added, “He’s going to have to make some really tough - I don’t know what the decision’s going to be, but I promise you it will occur. As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it’s going to happen.”
 
He said he could envision four or five scenarios that might arise to challenge the new president, citing Russia or the Middle East as possible sources of trouble.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/bidens-crisis-remarks-reverberate/



(Obama's campaign was not exactly happy about this prediction, by the way. Guess the muzzle will have to go back on ol' Joe, and soon.)



 


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 12

Tuesday, October 21, 2008 - 7:48amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
If Obama handles a foreign policy crisis like Kennedy did, that would mean Obama would have to get himself into a crisis that was of his own doing. Kennedy botched the Bay of Pigs invasion, then met with Kruschev in Vienna and received a verbal beat down. Kruschev left the summit with a very low opinion of Kennedy and considered him a weakling. A year later the Cuban missile crisis occurs.

Any comparison of Obama to Kennedy is quite telling. If Kennedy's incompetence as a foreign policy leader is what Obama aspires to or what Biden compares to, we will all be in a heap of trouble.

But no, we can't call JFK incompetent can we because he was assassinated! That wouldn't be very polite. Let the Democrats have their idiotic heroes.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.