About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Saturday, December 12, 2009 - 5:28pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Here's the latest spin for pro-warmers:

Review: E-mails show pettiness, not fraud
Climate experts, AP reporters go through 1,000 exchanges


By Seth Borenstein, Raphael Satter and Malcolm Ritter

updated 12:18 p.m. ET, Sat., Dec . 12, 2009
LONDON - E-mails stolen from climate scientists show they stonewalled skeptics and discussed hiding data — but the messages don't support claims that the science of global warming was faked, according to an exhaustive review by The Associated Press.

The 1,073 e-mails examined by the AP show that scientists harbored private doubts, however slight and fleeting, even as they told the world they were certain about climate change. However, the exchanges don't undercut the vast body of evidence showing the world is warming because of man-made greenhouse gas emissions.

The scientists were keenly aware of how their work would be viewed and used, and, just like politicians, went to great pains to shape their message. Sometimes, they sounded more like schoolyard taunts than scientific tenets.

Post 1

Saturday, December 12, 2009 - 6:18pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Considering what's at stake, it's amazing that professional journalists would make themselves, and their opinions the focus of this.  Who cares what they think?

If you want to understand "eat your cake and have it, too," read this article.  Ugh.

The "vast body of research" everyone's talking about comes from one place: CRU. The IPCC gets all of it's research material from CRU.  

(Edited by Teresa Summerlee Isanhart on 12/12, 6:40pm)


Post 2

Saturday, December 12, 2009 - 7:59pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Yeah, that vast body of research that is based upon tweaked data, fudged algorithms, data that wont be shared, and data that has since been destroyed. Yeah, that vast body of research, except for the research that didn't agree.

Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.