|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
 | ||||
 | ||||
| I erred in not mentioning Rand's reductio ad absurdum argument against a "sense-invalidity" argument: 1) Using my senses, things can appear different than they are. 2) Senses that don't pick-up things just as they are, aren't to ever be trusted. ================= Therefore (using a method that can't be trusted), it follows that senses err. [Senses, like axioms, have to used in any attempt to disprove them] | ||||
| ||||
 |
 |
|
 |
|
