About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unread


Post 0

Sunday, April 23, 2006 - 4:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I would be fascinated to hear what people here think of this painting and the story behind it.

Michael

(Edited by Newberry on 4/23, 4:18pm)


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 1

Monday, April 24, 2006 - 6:46pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
What do I think? Don't dishonestly, irrationally, and unnecessarily cheat or piss off someone who can publish something. They'll make you look like a idiot-- publicly-- and since the perpetrators have no good grounds for their actions, they cannot talk back and not look more like an idiot.

Post 2

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:30amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Don't F**ck with an artist.

Post 3

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 7:41amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
My line of thinking was along the lines of "sanction of the victim"...

Michael


Post 4

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 7:52amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I think it would be great to be immortalized in a painting, even if it's for being a bastard.

George

Edited to add a caveat: Only if the artist is a "great" artist, being "immortalized" by Duchamp would be insulting.

(Edited by George W. Cordero on 4/25, 7:57am)


Post 5

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 8:02amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
She was not so much dissed as her husband the turkey, (or cuckold?)

Post 6

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 8:04amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Do you mean that despite of what Mlle. Lange and her husband had done, the artist still painted a beautiful portrait of her?

As I was completely ignorant of the Western Art symbolisms, I was first drawn to the beautiful female body in the painting. Her head, neck, face, rosy cheek and the posture are natural, relaxed and yet graceful. Her headdress and footwear might have alerted me of her profession. I was puzzled by the turkey, and very startled by the male head under the seat.

PS. The shower of golden coins does not revolt me at all, as it comes from the light source high above.

(Edited by Hong Zhang on 4/25, 9:01am)


Post 7

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 11:22amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
George: "Edited to add a caveat: Only if the artist is a "great" artist, being "immortalized" by Duchamp would be insulting."

How would you know if he hasn't already done so?

Michael ;)


Post 8

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 4:12pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit

being "immortalized" by Duchamp would be insulting.

Depends on who is being immortalized.....


Post 9

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 4:25pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Michael,

George wrote: "I think it would be great to be immortalized in a painting, even if it's for being a bastard."

Do you still do male nudes?

Michael


Post 10

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 4:38pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
I have to be so fricken careful--inside I am just exploding with opinions!!! hahahahah.

Ok, I know this is not Objectivist, and I know Rand was nortorious for this...let's say the story is 100% true, what do you think of the artist as a person?

Michael

P.S. I don't know how I would paint the spirit of George...I'll let everyone know when I have. I doubt it would be a bastard though, I have a particular view of them...oops, I better not say anymore or I give away my intent!


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 11

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
"the spirit of George"? You mean this?

Raphael, St George

I shudder at the thought of the fate of that creature at the receiving end of St. George's stick...

 
 
 


Post 12

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 5:02pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hong! What kind of "shudder" are you talking about?

Quick addition:

Hong, you said the woman was beautiful, I know this is alot to ask, but since you are posting pics anyway...could you show us two other examples of paintings of beautiful women but not by this artist?

Michael

(Edited by Newberry on 4/25, 5:06pm)


Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 13

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 7:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hmm, what a strange request! Somehow I immediately thought about this:



Sorry it is only the back, but I do find this painting exceedingly beautiful.


Post 14

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 - 7:27pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hmm, why do you need two? OK, here is the second one:




Post 15

Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - 1:47pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Hey Hong, thanks for doing that. I like them both, the Ingres is the woman's back, but who is the other by? Reminds me of Rubens, and my guess...Van Eyck? Of course I need to ask for two or else I will only get a backside!  You mentioned that the Girodet was beautiful, do you mean that in the same way as these two? Do you detect a difference between them?

Michael


Post 16

Thursday, April 27, 2006 - 7:53amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Oh, the second painting is "Countess Golovine" by Elisabeth Louise Vigee Lebrun. I just flipped through my Sister Wendy's all-in-one story of painting book and picked out this one.

As for the Girodet, I thought the woman's body was beautifully painted. Very nice skin tones. Nice lighting too. Something might be said about her pose, but she clearly was a beauty.


Post to this thread


User ID Password or create a free account.