About
Content
Store
Forum

Rebirth of Reason
War
People
Archives
Objectivism

Post to this threadMark all messages in this thread as readMark all messages in this thread as unreadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


Post 20

Monday, June 27, 2011 - 11:47amSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Ed:

re: My next fiction book is going to be: "We the Living" ...


Be on the lookout for her 'plumbing' analogy. It's brief, she doesn't dwell on it, but it is apt.

Something like "Sure we need the plumbing of state, just like we need the plumbing in our homes. But we don't live for the plumbing, nor are our lives ruled ruled by the plumbers, just because we need plumbing."

Those aren't the exact words, but that argument always resonated with me.

It might be fiction, but it is filled with truths.

regards,
Fred



Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Sanction: 5, No Sanction: 0
Post 21

Monday, June 27, 2011 - 4:00pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Joe Maurone in 14: Where would Howard Roark be without Roger Enright? Where Roark was the architect, he didn't know how to "sell" it, and needed an Enright to intermediate his work to the world; pity we don't see more of how Enright does that, as he is an "unsung hero."
Something of a one-man corporate conglomerate, Enright was more into the production spheres.  It was Kent Lansing who was the salesman.
" Lansing is a salesman with a rare appreciation of artistic genius and an even rarer willingness to fight for it. ... 
"Lansing describes himself as a salesman, and shows Roark the value of a middleman. [Most people]  will not see the truth of the new ideas created by an innovator like Roark. They need to hear it from others. They need to hear it from a middleman — and the more middlemen the better. ...  In the struggle that Lansing fights and wins, he demonstrates that independence and integrity are not the exclusive prerogative of the creative artist, but are sometimes possessed by the middleman, as well." ( See Cliffs Notes here.)
Peter Reidy in 15: A related point that I've noticed is that nearly all of Rand's business heroes deliver hard goods and services; nobody is a speculator, venture capitalist, futures trader or what have you.  ... I think this lack of middlemen or salesmen is a dramatic matter.  Rand had a story to tell and ... 

I agree that even a monumental work such as Atlas Shrugged is a matter of selection.  Ted Keer pointed to the character of Father Amadeus who was excised (or exorcised) from the final version.  Steel and motors and the factories that use and make them are concretized values of the producers.  Making Roger Marsh or Neal Hammond an investment banker would have done little if anything for the work.  (Later, of course, Alan Greenspan wrote "The Assault on Integrity" for Capitalism: the Unknown Ideal.)

But I think that Fred in 19 in support of Reidy above gets closer to the truth:
I wonder if someone had ever explained Arbitrage to her, what she would have said?
The response I get is uniformly, 'You have to be kidding!'
It does not feel like "real" production.  In Ayn Rand's day, people nominally at least reconciled their check registers against their bank statements.  We don't do that anymore.  So, most people have no way to conceptualize what it is that a venture capitalist or arbitrage trader or stock broker actually does.  


Post 22

Monday, June 27, 2011 - 4:35pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks, Michael. While Enright was an advocate for Roark, Lansing was the name eluding me. (I was thinking Heller, but nope.)


Post 23

Monday, June 27, 2011 - 8:17pmSanction this postReply
Bookmark
Link
Edit
Thanks for all the feedback, you guys.

Ed


Post to this threadBack one pagePage 0Page 1


User ID Password or create a free account.